Not really what I meant. I don't want to u/l or d/l anything. I just want
one web server in the US to transfer files to another web server in the US
and control the transfer from NZ. I thought this would be possible with FP
because I can open both US sites at the same time and drag and drop files
between them.
message I'm tracking it more out of curiosity than the ability to help.
I always thought that the route could be many routes.
But from my view (and I may be totally wrong) is that traffic, whether it's
file uploads/downloads or calls for pages, would count towards your web
traffic count (maybe not the correct terminology) - no matter what route it
came from. I dunno if I'm making any sense what-so-ever.
| If your still tracking this thread, it looks like this is the case but I
| don't think it should be. Take this as an example:
|
| I have my .co.nz domain name and the DNS servers are in New Zealand but my
| web site is hosted in the US. Now I don't know a heck of a lot about it
all
| either but I assume that when someone accesses my web site, the server in
| New Zealand tells that person's machine where to go in the states to get
all
| the files to display the web site. I don't think all the files from my web
| site go through the DNS server in NZ first then get directed to the person
| who has requested them. Can you follow me? I thought the Internet followed
| the fastest path.
|
| It seems like FP can not make that direct connection between one site and
| another, instead needs to pass EVERYTHING through the local machine first.
| This frustrates me but it might not just be FP, perhaps all file transfer
| has to be done this way.
|
| I'm just so glad that I don't have a dialup modem otherwise I would be
| completely screwed (400meg web site).
|
|
| message | I'm no expert on this, but wouldn't bandwidth be used no matter how you
| moved it? Short of carrying a CD from one server to the other that is
|
| Curious2
|
|
| | | Ok just for the record. I transferred a file from one online site to
| | another. The file size was 3.1197meg. My local machine downloaded approx
| | 3.4000 meg and uploaded about the same - total bandwidth usage over six
| | megs. What a waste of my time and bandwidth! I don't know why FP can't
| just
| | transfer directly to the hosting server I want to upload the files from
| the
| | hosting server where they are coming from. Perhaps it is not as simple
as
| | what I thought. But at least I have answered my own question. After the
| | whole night trying.
| |
| |
| | | | > Hi, I am in a bit of a pickle. I want to transfer one live site to
| another
| | > (300-400 meg) and I don't want to publish the whole site from my PC
due
| to
| | > bandwidth limitations. I can open two published sites in FP03 (live on
| the
| | > web and resolved) and transfer between but the actual site I need to
| | publish
| | > to is a brand new one so the DNS isn't resolved yet. It has a fixed IP
| and
| | > FP extensions are installed but when I go to set the remote site to
that
| | ip
| | > address I get the fp popup to enter the user name and password but it
| wont
| | > let me in. The user id and pass are correct and the site is live on
the
| | > static ip, whats going on??? FTP and fp just doesn't work at all on
the
| | > fixed ip but my ftp separate ftp app works fine. My hosting account I
| want
| | > to transfer from will shut down soon so I need to transfer ASAP. Can
| | someone
| | > help please?
| | >
| | >
| |
| |
|
|