M
Mr. Analogy
I've read that you should use the actual "bold variant" family of a font
instead of just choosing "bold" (because the latter would just make it
heavier and you might lose some definition/character).
1. Is this true?
2. When In use Trebuchet MS in Publisher or Word 2003 they don't show the
bold or italic versions that are in the Font folder (Trebuchet MS Bold,etc.)
Do they just automagically use the bold family when you bold something?
And, if so (BONUS QUESTION) : is this better, the same, or worse "looking"
than a font with a special different family for bold (like Humanist 777 Demi,
etc.)
Thanks!
instead of just choosing "bold" (because the latter would just make it
heavier and you might lose some definition/character).
1. Is this true?
2. When In use Trebuchet MS in Publisher or Word 2003 they don't show the
bold or italic versions that are in the Font folder (Trebuchet MS Bold,etc.)
Do they just automagically use the bold family when you bold something?
And, if so (BONUS QUESTION) : is this better, the same, or worse "looking"
than a font with a special different family for bold (like Humanist 777 Demi,
etc.)
Thanks!