R
Ray Pixley
Is there a way of having varying column widths in a table and yet have the
tab and formula functions also work? I'm using Word 2003.
An example is where the first few row's column widths are 1", 3" and 2",
followed by rows with column widths of of 2", 2" and 2".
I've faked the above some by first using column widths of 1", 1", 2" and 2"
with an extra row as a "transition" row; merging cells where needed to get
the column widths wanted and using borders to turn on the diagonal and off
the vertical side of appropriate cells in the transition row. But the Word
formulas, i.e. SUM(), don't work correctly and setting the tabs for an entire
column doesn't work. So each cell's tabs have to be set individually, and
the formula function becomes useless and misleading. Yet my bosses, who are
not computer savy but can read a Word marketing brochure, don't understand
why this can't be done nor why I would dare suggest additional software is
needed.
There must be an easier and less time consuming way. Please advise.
tab and formula functions also work? I'm using Word 2003.
An example is where the first few row's column widths are 1", 3" and 2",
followed by rows with column widths of of 2", 2" and 2".
I've faked the above some by first using column widths of 1", 1", 2" and 2"
with an extra row as a "transition" row; merging cells where needed to get
the column widths wanted and using borders to turn on the diagonal and off
the vertical side of appropriate cells in the transition row. But the Word
formulas, i.e. SUM(), don't work correctly and setting the tabs for an entire
column doesn't work. So each cell's tabs have to be set individually, and
the formula function becomes useless and misleading. Yet my bosses, who are
not computer savy but can read a Word marketing brochure, don't understand
why this can't be done nor why I would dare suggest additional software is
needed.
There must be an easier and less time consuming way. Please advise.