B
Bjorn Holmgren
Hi!
I have a specifik question. The EMF format in Visio 2003 differs from Visio
2000. When I have texts with commas - i.e. "," - the EMF file have several
text objects, where each is the text to the comma. We have a problem because
of this, since we read and extract the text from our EMF files in C++ code.
This is impossible now when the text is divided in small parts. Example, i
have a text with some codes:
@,1,2,mytext, second text,third text,
This creates many textobjects, i.e. EMR_EXTTEXTOUTW.
@, / 1, /2, / mytext, / second text, / third text,
In this case six objects. And these rae of course impossible to locate and
concatenate together programatically. I have tested and this goes for all
text. A nomrla sentence is divided in small parts. I think this is a bugg.
The EMF file grows and gets very big also because of this.
Anyway, it worked different in Visio 2000, wher one text is one object.
Which much be the correct way.
I have a specifik question. The EMF format in Visio 2003 differs from Visio
2000. When I have texts with commas - i.e. "," - the EMF file have several
text objects, where each is the text to the comma. We have a problem because
of this, since we read and extract the text from our EMF files in C++ code.
This is impossible now when the text is divided in small parts. Example, i
have a text with some codes:
@,1,2,mytext, second text,third text,
This creates many textobjects, i.e. EMR_EXTTEXTOUTW.
@, / 1, /2, / mytext, / second text, / third text,
In this case six objects. And these rae of course impossible to locate and
concatenate together programatically. I have tested and this goes for all
text. A nomrla sentence is divided in small parts. I think this is a bugg.
The EMF file grows and gets very big also because of this.
Anyway, it worked different in Visio 2000, wher one text is one object.
Which much be the correct way.