E
Epinn
Re: Insert|Picture vs. Format|AutoShape (no line, transparent) .....Fill
Effects|Picture
I welcome any input on the pros and cons of using (A) Insert|Picture and (B)
Format|AutoShape....Picture respectively. This can help me determine which
is a better method to use under different circumstances.
If there is animation involved, I prefer the latter method. This is because
if I want to change the picture, I don't have to redo the animation; don't
even have to go with the "save as htm" route.
If I have to include an image in the footer area (especially the number
placeholder), the former method may be better. This way I don't have to
remember to tick the "slide number" checkbox in the header and footer
dialogue box.
If you have any ideas or experience that you want to share, I would
appreciate hearing them. If you think that I am on the wrong track, feel
free to let me know.
Appreciate guidance.
Epinn
Effects|Picture
I welcome any input on the pros and cons of using (A) Insert|Picture and (B)
Format|AutoShape....Picture respectively. This can help me determine which
is a better method to use under different circumstances.
If there is animation involved, I prefer the latter method. This is because
if I want to change the picture, I don't have to redo the animation; don't
even have to go with the "save as htm" route.
If I have to include an image in the footer area (especially the number
placeholder), the former method may be better. This way I don't have to
remember to tick the "slide number" checkbox in the header and footer
dialogue box.
If you have any ideas or experience that you want to share, I would
appreciate hearing them. If you think that I am on the wrong track, feel
free to let me know.
Appreciate guidance.
Epinn