We're never going to see a fix for sync services

K

Kerry

Well, I downloaded the recent update that came out today and read all
the documentation around the release and there is absolutely nothing
there to indicate any fix for sync services. Almost two years later
and one of the most critical things that people do, sync with their
mobile devices/smartphones, still doesn't work properly on Entourage.
Two years of working with a workaround that can still lead to problems
due to manual manipulation. Its amazing Microsoft can't get this fixed
but I guess they can't. We're now way too close to Office 2010 to hope
that anything will be resolved in Entourage. However, honestly I gave
up over a year ago thinking this would ever get fixed.

I still use Entourage as there just isn't much of an alternative out
there when using a Mac. The other third party stuff uses sync services
and they too have problems. The only thing that is somewhat reliable
is the Apple apps iCal and Addressbook but they are so underpowered
compared to Entourage or some of the other offerings. I've been told
that this is fixable by some and by others no one is taking
responsiblility so if we use Entourage as its intended to be used we
still end up with the same sync mess of dups, data loss etc we got
when the product was released in Jan 2008. All the time that has gone
into fixing things, supporting people, the time spent on the phone
with Microsoft and Apple etc etc. Its astounding in a way.

It'll be interesting to see if this will get fixed when Microsoft
switches to Outlook which will use a completely different database
schema. Even if it does its still too bad for Entourage as I suspect
it would remain a viable Information Manager for people who don't need
to move to 2010. I'll move on the sole basis alone if it fixes this
sync problem. Yet, who knows and I only know the Outlook I have which
is 2003 and I prefer Entourage although Outlook is a good product.

Ah well...
 
J

Jeff Chapman

Hello Kerry,

Well, I downloaded the recent update that came out today and read all
the documentation around the release and there is absolutely nothing
there to indicate any fix for sync services. Almost two years later
and one of the most critical things that people do, sync with their
mobile devices/smartphones, still doesn't work properly on Entourage.
Two years of working with a workaround that can still lead to problems
due to manual manipulation. Its amazing Microsoft can't get this fixed
but I guess they can't. We're now way too close to Office 2010 to hope
that anything will be resolved in Entourage. However, honestly I gave
up over a year ago thinking this would ever get fixed.

I can feel your pain, Kerry. So many of us have been there.

I really tried hard to make Entourage useful with my iPod Touch.
The experiment, which spanned several weeks and multiple applications,
was ultimately a failure.
I still use Entourage as there just isn't much of an alternative out
there when using a Mac. The other third party stuff uses sync services
and they too have problems. The only thing that is somewhat reliable
is the Apple apps iCal and Addressbook but they are so underpowered
compared to Entourage or some of the other offerings. I've been told
that this is fixable by some and by others no one is taking
responsiblility so if we use Entourage as its intended to be used we
still end up with the same sync mess of dups, data loss etc we got
when the product was released in Jan 2008.

My current solution for managing and syncing calendars, contacts,
and tasks between my Mac on iPod Touch doesn't even involve
Entourage at all. There are fundamental inadequacies in the design
of Entourage 2008 that make it a poor candidate for use with
mobile devices. For instance, Entourage supports categories and
projects for calendars, whereas the Calendar app on iPhone/iPod Touch
only supports different calendars, not projects or categories.
(Outlook for Windows supports both.)
Tasks _cannot_ be dragged and dropped onto the calendar in Entourage
to create appointments, but the same process will actually work in iCal.
(Curiously, tasks from Entourage can be dragged and dropped onto
the _iCal_ calendar... what the... ?)
Also, mobile devices cannot be synced directly to Entourage since
Entourage does not use a dedicated sync conduit - it uses Apple
Sync Services, which has been buggy for some time and the source
of many headaches for many users, as is evidenced on this forum.

So if you wish to continue with Entourage, here are the options
I understand at present (anyone with other options, please feel
free to chime in!):

Calendar sync: Sync to iCal using the "Sync Services" option
in Entourage's Preferences, and then sync your iCal calendar
manually with your iPhone/iPod Touch via iTunes.
(MobileMe may also be used to sync iCal online, but I haven't
tried it.)

Task/to-do sync: Same as above, or use MarkSpace's Missing Sync
utility (USD$39.95) to sync Entourage tasks up with Fliq Tasks.

Contact/address book sync: Sync to Apple Address Book using the
Sync Services option in Entourage's Preferences, and then sync
your iCal calendar manually with your iPhone/iPod Touch via iTunes.

Notes: Sync to Apple Mail using the
Sync Services option in Entourage's Preferences, and then sync
your mail notes manually with your iPhone/iPod Touch via iTunes.
Alternatively, use MarkSpace's Missing Sync
utility (USD$39.95) to sync Entourage tasks up with Fliq Notes.

There are other third-party apps such as Things, OmniFocus and
so on for tasks/to-do lists and GTD solutions, but none of them will
sync with Entourage. (I've abandoned Entourage tasks completely.)

As for notes, Missing Sync actually works pretty well with Entourage,
but I don't think that content in the notes (non-textual contents such as
images, etc.) can be synced at all.

Of course, Entourage users connected to an Exchange server
may have a few more options than the above, but most home users and
many businesses (my own included) do not use Exchange.
It'll be interesting to see if this will get fixed when Microsoft
switches to Outlook which will use a completely different database
schema. Even if it does its still too bad for Entourage as I suspect
it would remain a viable Information Manager for people who don't need
to move to 2010. I'll move on the sole basis alone if it fixes this
sync problem. Yet, who knows and I only know the Outlook I have which
is 2003 and I prefer Entourage although Outlook is a good product.

Why do you prefer Entourage? I can understand that there are
some strengths to the product, namely the Project Center view,
the ability to link Entourage items to other content such as files,
Entourage tasks, notes and so on. These are strengths that
Outlook doesn't yet offer. However, Outlook is a far more robust
application, offering RSS feed views, multiple calendar syncing
with mobile devices, and customizable views that far outperform
anything that Entourage can provide. Entourage is more "Mac-like",
granted; but Outlook will be (re-)released for the Mac next year, and
it may be just as Mac-like as any other Mac application for all
we know.

Even exporting to other applications and data formats from Entourage
is a process fraught with severe limitations and drawbacks.
(For instance, notes, tasks and calendar items can ONLY be exported
to Entourage's proprietary .rge format, completely unusable
by any other application.) I cannot even drag and drop most of
my Entourage data into Office applications... that is the very sad
state of things that we are talking about here.

If you plan to work only with one Mac and don't need to take your
data anywhere, then Entourage can be a passable option.
I actually did this for a while, until I got the foolish notion to
start porting my calendar and task list around on my iPod Touch... ;-)
It's actually even possible to port your Office user identity and
Entourage data around on a USB memory stick and use it on different Macs,
provided you set up the aliases correctly.

Personally, I see no need to stick with Entourage any longer after
Outlook 2010 (2011?) is released and that I've confirmed that my Entourage
data can be safely imported into Outlook. Entourage is ultimately a
colossal failure for Microsoft in terms of working with mobile devices,
and it is an ant amidst giants in terms of data portability when
compared to Outlook. The only thing that I hope that Microsoft
will retain in the new version of Outlook for Mac is the Project
Center view. (Please, send feedback to Microsoft on this if you
want and need this feature - time is certainly running out!)

Jeff
 
C

Corentin Cras-Méneur

Kerry said:
Well, I downloaded the recent update that came out today and read all
the documentation around the release and there is absolutely nothing
there to indicate any fix for sync services.

Again Kerry, as you very well know, some of the issues appear to be in
Apple's hands.... There might not be much to expect from Office updates.

Corentin
 
K

Kerry

Again Kerry, as you very well know, some of the issues appear to be in
Apple's hands.... There might not be much to expect from Office updates.

Corentin

--
          --- Office:Mac MVP  http://www.cortig.net/wordpress/---
       http://www.mvps.org      -    http://mvp.support..microsoft.com
    MVPs are not MS employees    -    Les MVP ne travaillent pas pour MS
 Remove "NoSpam" to e-mail me    -      Retirez "NoSpam" pourm'écrire

I know Corentin. I've talked to Apple but they really are divorcing
themselves from this and third party products although they are aware
of the scope of the issue. They'll talk iCal, Addressbook and Mobileme
and that's back from their engineering and that's it. They know third
party developers have had quite the time of this and third party
developers have been actively submitting the issues/bugs as its
affecting their sales and causing them great support problems. Some
are pretty annoyed (take a look at the product Manager's comments
(Aure) at Objective-Decisions.

I really don't think we will get anything from Apple on this one. They
have been really great around other things I've input and their
engineering has always got the stuff fixed. This one though - everyone
is throwing up their hands and we end users are dying (not in a
literal sense but I for one am sure exhausted by all this nonsense on
the Mac).
 
K

Kerry

Hello Kerry,



I can feel your pain, Kerry. So many of us have been there.

I really tried hard to make Entourage useful with my iPod Touch.
The experiment, which spanned several weeks and multiple applications,
was ultimately a failure.


My current solution for managing and syncing calendars, contacts,
and tasks between my Mac on iPod Touch doesn't even involve
Entourage at all. There are fundamental inadequacies in the design
of Entourage 2008 that make it a poor candidate for use with
mobile devices. For instance, Entourage supports categories and
projects for calendars, whereas the Calendar app on iPhone/iPod Touch
only supports different calendars, not projects or categories.
(Outlook for Windows supports both.)
Tasks _cannot_ be dragged and dropped onto the calendar in Entourage
to create appointments, but the same process will actually work in iCal.
(Curiously, tasks from Entourage can be dragged and dropped onto
the _iCal_ calendar... what the... ?)
Also, mobile devices cannot be synced directly to Entourage since
Entourage does not use a dedicated sync conduit - it uses Apple
Sync Services, which has been buggy for some time and the source
of many headaches for many users, as is evidenced on this forum.

So if you wish to continue with Entourage, here are the options
I understand at present (anyone with other options, please feel
free to chime in!):

 Calendar sync: Sync to iCal using the "Sync Services" option
   in Entourage's Preferences, and then sync your iCal calendar
   manually with your iPhone/iPod Touch via iTunes.
   (MobileMe may also be used to sync iCal online, but I haven't
    tried it.)

 Task/to-do sync: Same as above, or use MarkSpace's Missing Sync
   utility (USD$39.95) to sync Entourage tasks up with Fliq Tasks.

 Contact/address book sync: Sync to Apple Address Book using the
   Sync Services option in Entourage's Preferences, and then sync
   your iCal calendar manually with your iPhone/iPod Touch via iTunes..

 Notes: Sync to Apple Mail using the
   Sync Services option in Entourage's Preferences, and then sync
   your mail notes manually with your iPhone/iPod Touch via iTunes.
   Alternatively, use MarkSpace's Missing Sync
   utility (USD$39.95) to sync Entourage tasks up with Fliq Notes.

There are other third-party apps such as Things, OmniFocus and
so on for tasks/to-do lists and GTD solutions, but none of them will
sync with Entourage. (I've abandoned Entourage tasks completely.)

As for notes, Missing Sync actually works pretty well with Entourage,
but I don't think that content in the notes (non-textual contents such as
images, etc.) can be synced at all.

Of course, Entourage users connected to an Exchange server
may have a few more options than the above, but most home users and
many businesses (my own included) do not use Exchange.


Why do you prefer Entourage? I can understand that there are
some strengths to the product, namely the Project Center view,
the ability to link Entourage items to other content such as files,
Entourage tasks, notes and so on. These are strengths that
Outlook doesn't yet offer. However, Outlook is a far more robust
application, offering RSS feed views, multiple calendar syncing
with mobile devices, and customizable views that far outperform
anything that Entourage can provide. Entourage is more "Mac-like",
granted; but Outlook will be (re-)released for the Mac next year, and
it may be just as Mac-like as any other Mac application for all
we know.

Even exporting to other applications and data formats from Entourage
is a process fraught with severe limitations and drawbacks.
(For instance, notes, tasks and calendar items can ONLY be exported
to Entourage's proprietary .rge format, completely unusable
by any other application.) I cannot even drag and drop most of
my Entourage data into Office applications... that is the very sad
state of things that we are talking about here.

If you plan to work only with one Mac and don't need to take your
data anywhere, then Entourage can be a passable option.
I actually did this for a while, until I got the foolish notion to
start porting my calendar and task list around on my iPod Touch... ;-)
It's actually even possible to port your Office user identity and
Entourage data around on a USB memory stick and use it on different Macs,
provided you set up the aliases correctly.

Personally, I see no need to stick with Entourage any longer after
Outlook 2010 (2011?) is released and that I've confirmed that my Entourage
data can be safely imported into Outlook. Entourage is ultimately a
colossal failure for Microsoft in terms of working with mobile devices,
and it is an ant amidst giants in terms of data portability when
compared to Outlook. The only thing that I hope that Microsoft
will retain in the new version of Outlook for Mac is the Project
Center view. (Please, send feedback to Microsoft on this if you
want and need this feature - time is certainly running out!)

Jeff

Jeff, thanks. You are so right on. Everything you said is absolutely
correct. I've investigated this from all angles. You're right,
Entourage doesn't make a good client for mobile devices for all the
reasons you outlined.

However, for me, Entourage really is where I take my raw data, which
might come from a handheld and change it into information that I use
for my final product which is always some kind of document. Linking,
categories and the Project Management centre are central to what I do
with Entourage.

I've never concerned myself with Entourage not supporting categories
on the handheld. Its not necessary for me. In terms of my Palm, all it
means when I use iCal with Missing Sync for the Palm is that my
calendar items are nicely coloured. I can't search on these on the
handheld but can search on categories and more in Entourage.
Additionally, it doesn't matter to me that these things aren't linked
on the handheld but it is essential that I have good linking in
Entourage. When I go to write my document, a lot of my research is at
my finger tips in Entourage and its easy for me to wade through it to
find the relevant info. Thus, I'm able to produce my written document/
product quite fast. When I tried the Apple apps for two months,
although all the info was there, it was not easy to find as the
searches can only be refined down to a boolean search and in each
product individually. It was doable just not as nice. However, you
certainly don't have to deal with the sync issues. Plus you're right
iCal etc lends itself architecturally far better to the handheld which
in my case is now a Palm TX and an iPhone 3GS.

I totally agree with you about Outlook as I still use it but mainly to
go back and look for past info when I worked on a PC. Its definitely a
good client and very robust. I never had a database corrupt etc. It
works perfectly with Exchange which is what it is designed to do. If
you look through anything to do with Entourage and Exchange
(fortunately I no longer work on an Exchange system) Entourage is
nothing but trouble for Exchange users. Many IT departments will not
allow anything to connect to Exchange other than Outlook.

However, the things you've noticed it missing are exactly those things
wherein I prefer Entourage - linking and Projects. Outlook does
provide categories. You mentioned views but I find for my purposes
Entourage provides a plethora of views. The Apple apps provide one
view - their view. That's it. You need to get add-on software such as
iClock Pro so you can see Calendar items in a list view but that's
only one view. Ical is good for what it does but it is not intended to
be an Entourage and Apple is quick to admit that and don't pretend in
any fashion that iCal can or would ever replace Entourage. They'd
actually have to create their own kind of Entourage product which I've
suggested to them and to include this in iWork. I reminded them they
had a pretty robust info manager in the 90s which was Claris Organizer
and they sold that to Palm when they were having trouble back then.

My problem with Entourage is that when you turn on sync services and
you have more than one module turned on (this is everyone's problem)
sync is totally unreliable and unpredictable leading to dup'd data,
data loss etc and constantly requires Entourage cleanups. In some
unfortunate situations, these problems might get replicated back into
sync services and then iCal and then what a mess to clean up. To work
around this I've just worked with one module enabled at a time
primarily Calendar and Tasks as that what I use the most and its
relatively reliable if you do this. However, when you do have to
change modules for sync since this is such a manual process it is of
course prone to human error. It should be totally unnecessary for us
to have to do this but its the only way to use Entourage in a mobile
environment and get reasonably reliable syncs.

However, I'm always looking for a way out of Entourage. What do you
use if you don't use Entourage. You didn't actually mention that. I
kind of am assuming you use the Apple apps and have given up on
Entourage entirely. Can you let me know what you use and if you don't
mind me asking what is your workflow and how does all this work for
you. Like I said, I'm kind of desperate to get out of Entourage I just
haven't found a solution that works for my workflow needs.

Thanks again Jeff for your very well informed feedback.

Kerry
 
C

Corentin Cras-Méneur

Kerry said:
I really don't think we will get anything from Apple on this one. They
have been really great around other things I've input and their
engineering has always got the stuff fixed. This one though - everyone
is throwing up their hands and we end users are dying (not in a
literal sense but I for one am sure exhausted by all this nonsense on
the Mac).

I share the feeling :-\

Corentin
 
J

Jeff Chapman

Hello Kerry,

However, I'm always looking for a way out of Entourage. What do you
use if you don't use Entourage. You didn't actually mention that. I
kind of am assuming you use the Apple apps and have given up on
Entourage entirely. Can you let me know what you use and if you don't
mind me asking what is your workflow and how does all this work for
you. Like I said, I'm kind of desperate to get out of Entourage I just
haven't found a solution that works for my workflow needs.

Thanks for all of your comments - interesting to hear your
experiences on the sync issues between Entourage and your Palm.

I still use Entourage for my email and for the newsgroups ;-)
For calendaring (love that verb!), I use iCal almost exclusively,
and sync it to my iPod Touch via iTunes or via Spanning Sync.
The verdict is still out on Spanning Sync, I think - it syncs your
iCal data with Google Calendar, so it's a client-to-cloud app.
Not perfect - it doesn't always sync as you would like, and
some items take time to reflect, or else you need to clean up the
calendar items using Calendar Cleaner, a separate (and chargeable)
utility. I get around the problem of not having categories by
prefixing my calendar names instead with a pound sign (such as "#fun",
"#professional" and so on.

Entourage does offer the "travel time" option for calendar items
which iCal lacks, which I think is pretty neat, actually.
Have you used that? I really do miss it on iCal. You have to fake
it by sandwiching your calendar items with two MORE calendar
items to simulate travel time, and that's one of iCal's drawbacks.

(I always wonder why Microsoft didn't go ahead and develop
a calendar app of their own that syncs with Entourage... ?)

For tasks, I use Cultured Code's Things, and simply drag and drop
my task items to iCal, which works fairly well. The calendar
items get prefixed with a hyphen for some reason when they
are dropped into iCal, but that is a minor inconvenience.
Entourage isn't too drag-and-drop friendly, unfortunately.
I do like Entourage's color-coded task features; but Things allows
me to sync to my iPod Touch (the Things app for iPhone/iPod Touch),
so that works generally very well, and the syncing via Wi-Fi is
quite trouble-free, at least for me.

There is also a nice application called "MyLife Organized"
at mlo.net, which is basically a task management, planning
and GTD program. However, it's only on Windows. They're
apparently working on an iPhone version which should be
interesting. It works on Crossover for Mac and of course
Parallels, but it's not quite as handy as having it in Windows.

For contacts/address book items, I find Apple's built-in
app to work fine, and it syncs fine using iTunes.
(Honestly, I am no fan of using iTunes for syncing. It almost
seems incongruent - why use a music player app to sync
your calendar? Duh...)

Finally, for notes I use MarkSpace's Missing Sync, which
has a fairly robust sync conduit that works well directly
with Entourage's notes, provided you enable syncing in
the Entourage preferences.

So as you can see, it's pretty much a piecemeal setup, and far from
perfect. (Productivity-wise, I almost feel that I was better off
with just using Entourage and not taking my data anywhere
or syncing with anything at all! Your posts have made me
reconsider how much time I have invested into trying to make
my tools "more productive", while I could have spent that time
actually being more productive despite the tools... :eek: )
But honestly, Outlook was a great solution for me at work for
many years when I was on the Windows platform, and
I really haven't found anything for the Mac yet to replace it.

Jeff
 
K

Kerry

Corentin said:
I share the feeling :-\

Corentin


--
--- Office:Mac MVP http://www.cortig.net/wordpress/ ---
http://www.mvps.org - http://mvp.support.microsoft.com
MVPs are not MS employees - Les MVP ne travaillent pas pour MS
Remove "NoSpam" to e-mail me - Retirez "NoSpam" pour m'crire

Thanks Corentin. Its always nice to know that you aren't alone in your
feelings. I've always found you and I are similar pages.

I forgot to sort of address your main point - that we can't expect
anything from Microsoft on a fix. I totally agree. It won't happen for
a variety of reasons. However, I feel the new reason is we are now in
too short of a time-frame till the replacement of Entourage with
Outlook. Microsoft won't bother now trying to do anything about this
due to the complexity of the problem. We may find that Outlook for
Office for the Mac will work though as they are going to use a whole
new, modern database schema (yeah) and hopefully this lends itself to
viable sync with sync services.

Corentin, I know you are one of the people that stuck with Entourage
and didn't dump it. Can I ask what keeps you in Entourage as I know
sync is important to you also. I know why I'm still I'm still using it
but so many people have given me strong reasons to move on (I of know
these reasons anyone) anyway for me I just can't find anything with
the power of Entourage or works any better with sync service
(Contactizer Pro but this is no Entourage and when it fails with sync
it makes Entourage look like a well tune porche if you can believe
it).
 
J

Jeff Chapman

Hello again, Kerry,

Can I ask what keeps you in Entourage as I know
sync is important to you also. I know why I'm still I'm still using it
but so many people have given me strong reasons to move on (I of know
these reasons anyone) anyway for me I just can't find anything with
the power of Entourage or works any better with sync service
(Contactizer Pro but this is no Entourage and when it fails with sync
it makes Entourage look like a well tune porche if you can believe
it).

Sorry to butt in on your question, but for the record I just
wanted to say that although I said some harsh things about
the limitations of Entourage, I didn't want you to get the
impression that it's a useless piece of software that people should
migrate away from at all costs.
Like I mentioned, it can work well enough if you don't need
to sync with any mobile devices and don't need to export your
data to other formats or share data with other applications.
My feeling about Entourage is that without Exchange, it's basically
just a personal desktop solution for basic personal information needs.

There are a couple of general approaches to technology as I
see it. One is to use the technology (software) you have on hand,
and find ways to get around the limitations (which may include
introducing more technology in the process).
The other is to completely replace the technology that you have,
which often has the unfortunate side effect of introducing
new issues that further need to be dealt with and worked around.
Either way you put it, we are assuming that technology is the
answer to the question... but we haven't actually addressed
the initial unspoken question. Namely: "What do you want
to do with all this?"

I myself often struggle with this question. I end up spending
a great deal of time tweaking the technology, and then suddenly
stop to ask myself, "What was I trying to accomplish here?"

If you just need to record calendar events, a simple to-do list
with due dates, your contact list and notes, and have no particular
need to carry them around on a mobile device, Entourage can
work fine. But if you are needing to carry this information
around with you, it might be useful to ask yourself what benefits
there are in using technology to mobilize your personal information.
What are you putting into it, and what are you getting out of it
in return? In short, is the solution you chose worth the time
you've invested in maintaining it?

A lot of us once used "low-tech" methods such as paper appointment
minders and books and even Rolodexes and index cards to keep
track of these things. Many of us still do. (I actually bought a 2009
appointment book at the beginning of this year...)
The problem with these methods is portability.
I personally would rather carry around either a mobile device
or an appointment minder, not both.

Then there is the issue of ease of input. Even though many
mobile devices feature relatively easy-to-use input technologies
compared to even five years' previous, I wager that it's generally
easier for people to pick up a pen and paper and scribble out
"Get pet food" than to pull out their iPhone, find the app and
wait for it to load, open up a new note, futz with the touch keyboard,
name and save the note. By introducing technology into what was
originally a very elementary and trivial process, we have gained
the benefit of being able to collect and search for our information in
one dedicated location. But the major disadvantage is that we need to
deal with technology on its terms, adjusting ourselves to meet its
needs rather than adjusting the technology to meet ours.
In short, technology is not as pliable as our traditional pen-and-paper
methods of collecting and saving information.
It can ultimately be far more powerful, but the question is whether
we really need that power or not, or whether we just _think_ that
we do.

I've been experimenting with software called Life Balance by
Llamagraphics, which allows to-dos to be listed in outline
format, prioritized by urgency and effort, and for overall
customizable categories (such as "health", "professional", "family"
and so on) to be displayed in pie chart format, to show you
what you've been focusing on the most.
Entourage will give you the to-do list and the color coding,
and you can sort to-dos by category. But you cannot make those
pie charts. On the other hand, it is possible (although a bit
time-consuming) to do this in Outlook for Windows, by exporting
or dragging and dropping tasks into Excel, removing the fields
you don't need and then creating a graph from there.
It might be possible to use Automator or AppleScript to copy
to-dos from Entourage and paste them into Excel, automating
some or most of this process. The question is: is this a valuable
and worthwhile use of my time? That's ultimately the question
we need to ask... and this question should come before the commitment
to investigate or purchase software.

(On the other hand, it is interesting to tinker with things,
just to see if they can be done ;-D )

Jeff
 
K

Kerry

Hello again, Kerry,



Sorry to butt in on your question, but for the record I just
wanted to say that although I said some harsh things about
the limitations of Entourage, I didn't want you to get the
impression that it's a useless piece of software that people should
migrate away from at all costs.
Like I mentioned, it can work well enough if you don't need
to sync with any mobile devices and don't need to export your
data to other formats or share data with other applications.
My feeling about Entourage is that without Exchange, it's basically
just a personal desktop solution for basic personal information needs.

There are a couple of general approaches to technology as I
see it. One is to use the technology (software) you have on hand,
and find ways to get around the limitations (which may include
introducing more technology in the process).
The other is to completely replace the technology that you have,
which often has the unfortunate side effect of introducing
new issues that further need to be dealt with and worked around.
Either way you put it, we are assuming that technology is the
answer to the question... but we haven't actually addressed
the initial unspoken question. Namely: "What do you want
to do with all this?"

I myself often struggle with this question. I end up spending
a great deal of time tweaking the technology, and then suddenly
stop to ask myself, "What was I trying to accomplish here?"

If you just need to record calendar events, a simple to-do list
with due dates, your contact list and notes, and have no particular
need to carry them around on a mobile device, Entourage can
work fine. But if you are needing to carry this information
around with you, it might be useful to ask yourself what benefits
there are in using technology to mobilize your personal information.
What are you putting into it, and what are you getting out of it
in return? In short, is the solution you chose worth the time
you've invested in maintaining it?

A lot of us once used "low-tech" methods such as paper appointment
minders and books and even Rolodexes and index cards to keep
track of these things. Many of us still do. (I actually bought a 2009
appointment book at the beginning of this year...)
The problem with these methods is portability.
I personally would rather carry around either a mobile device
or an appointment minder, not both.

Then there is the issue of ease of input. Even though many
mobile devices feature relatively easy-to-use input technologies
compared to even five years' previous, I wager that it's generally
easier for people to pick up a pen and paper and scribble out
"Get pet food" than to pull out their iPhone, find the app and
wait for it to load, open up a new note, futz with the touch keyboard,
name and save the note. By introducing technology into what was
originally a very elementary and trivial process, we have gained
the benefit of being able to collect and search for our information in
one dedicated location. But the major disadvantage is that we need to
deal with technology on its terms, adjusting ourselves to meet its
needs rather than adjusting the technology to meet ours.
In short, technology is not as pliable as our traditional pen-and-paper
methods of collecting and saving information.
It can ultimately be far more powerful, but the question is whether
we really need that power or not, or whether we just _think_ that
we do.

I've been experimenting with software called Life Balance by
Llamagraphics, which allows to-dos to be listed in outline
format, prioritized by urgency and effort, and for overall
customizable categories (such as "health", "professional", "family"
and so on) to be displayed in pie chart format, to show you
what you've been focusing on the most.
Entourage will give you the to-do list and the color coding,
and you can sort to-dos by category. But you cannot make those
pie charts. On the other hand, it is possible (although a bit
time-consuming) to do this in Outlook for Windows, by exporting
or dragging and dropping tasks into Excel, removing the fields
you don't need and then creating a graph from there.
It might be possible to use Automator or AppleScript to copy
to-dos from Entourage and paste them into Excel, automating
some or most of this process. The question is: is this a valuable
and worthwhile use of my time? That's ultimately the question
we need to ask... and this question should come before the commitment
to investigate or purchase software.

(On the other hand, it is interesting to tinker with things,
just to see if they can be done ;-D )

Jeff

Jeff, I like your logic. I like that you are able to step outside the
technology box so to speak and ask is it adding value or taking away
from our quality of life. To be honest, I do ask myself this question
with regards to technology. My decision to return to the Mac in 2003
was predicated on two things 1. I now work as an independent IT
consultant and no longer have to use what I'm told to use 2. I
preferred the Mac, certainly back then, as Windows consumed too much
of my time with updates, crashes, slowness at startup (virus checker
whirls away, Windows is downloading yet more updates and on and on it
goes). So I went back to the Mac and was a happy camper up till I'd
say really when Entourage 2008 came out and then all the questions you
pose but primarily the question what are we trying to do with this
technology (accomplish) and what are we really doing and getting out
of it changed.

I found in March of 08 a workaround that allows Entourage to work
somewhat well as a client for mobility. As long as only one module is
enabled for sync, sync's are pretty reliable. Yet, with Entourage,
working this way, you are spending more time making sure if you've
changed the other modules that you remember to switch to them to sync
etc etc. Manual and thus prone to error and then again time consuming.
Your paper and pen analogy is right on here. Some things are just
simpler done the old way. I still use paper and pen and I write with a
fountain pen. I always have. A Mont Blanc fountain pen and my fountain
pen from university is a gold Parker (still have it). I do volunteer
work as a clinical counselor and I couldn't imagine sitting in front
of my client with a computer typing in their most private of details
as they talked. However, I used to work for three years at the Centre
for Addictions and Mental health and they automated everything since I
left and if you sit with a psychiatrist or therapist they busily type
away in their computer. They ask first if you're comfortable with this
as its so beyond the norm of a psychotherapeutic session but hey
technology is even molding them to technology.

So back to Entourage. As a technology it did meet my needs although it
does require more work on my part to do the inputs but the outputs
were worth it. A lot of my work involves research and planning. My
product is always a document. The product is based on information
converted from data. Entourage, due to its linking, categorizing,
project management module and almost SQL type search capability is
able to take the data I input and allow me to convert that to
information. That is, if I've collected a lot of material around
something, its easier to put the pieces together with Entourage than
iCal which might contain the data but its more difficult to ascertain
the relations between one piece and another simply because at best it
only supports boolean searches.

With that said though, Entourage has become a time-consumer and as you
say the technology is molding me rather than it easily assisting me
with what I'm trying to accomplish. As you can imagine, with Entourage
working 100% it is more time consuming to categorize, link, apply
records to a project etc but the end result of retrieving that data to
turn it into useful information that would make up my document was
worth it. Now, with Entourage not working well and one having to fuss
with syncs that don't work the way they're supposed to, syncs that
might cause a data mess such as dups or data loss and even a corrupted
DB, the technology is has become an impediment. The technology is
molding the way I work. Generally, I would just be working away,
gathering requirements from a client, doing the research, the
interviews etc etc and then finally developing a my product which as I
mentioned would be a document that is either an analysis of where
something is at, a recommendation to do something etc. Entourage is
actually taking away from the real work and making me work at keeping
Entourage running. It is now working against what I'm trying to
accomplish.

With this in mind and knowing that mobility is essential to me as
after say a client meeting of whatever type I would enter the
information in my mobile device to be sync'd to Entourage that would
then get manipulated into information, I decided to give the Apple
apps a go. They are very simple to use, fast and make it pretty easy
to input this information on the handheld knowing that it would sync
back to the desktop client reliably without me spending ridiculous
amounts of time fixing a sync mess. The problem I found after two
months of using the Apple apps is that when I went to find my
information to develop my product, it was not so easy. Searches were
leading to multiple hits and I'd have to find what I was really
looking for. I might know that some of these hits were related to the
project I was working on or related to a specific client but tons
wasn't. I now had the laborious task of trying to find information
that was related to that information. It was there it was just more
cumbersome to find. Entourage improves on this modality in that I've
spent time making these connections and it is just a matter of jumping
from one to another and on and on. This is Entourage's strength and
power that I can't replicate with the Apple apps.

Now this is simply a way I got used to working and it all worked well
till Jan 15 08 when Entourage came out. However, having read what you
said it suddenly dawned on me well I didn't always work this way and I
was quite successful with the way I used to work. I went to College
and University in the 70s and early 80s. I didn't have a computer. I
had to develop very complex papers and I did all that in the library,
with books, microfiche, paper and pen and finally my typewriter (I
felt so lucky I took typing in grade 8 and 9 and was the fastest
typest in the class as this sure paid off in University - I didn't
have to pay someone 20 cents a page to type out my document). The only
thing I kind of fought with was my typing errors and getting the
whiteout in the right spot (again a little technology getting in my
way but certainly nothing of significance).

So I sit here thinking maybe I should just stop letting Entourage rule
me. Honestly, I've really thought about this way too much. I even
tried an alternate product to see if I could get beyond the power of
the Apple apps but to something somewhat approaching Entourage's
capability. So I got Contactizer Pro and not realizing it too had a
serious issue with sync spent time learning this system only to find
that when sync failed on it boy did it fail. It required a complete de-
install of the whole product and re-install however, I lost all the
links I made. My computer has turned into a massive time consumer and
rather than the value add its been its become for the first time I
think I want to throw this thing out the window.

There is one final option which doesn't appeal to me at all and that's
to go back to Windows as this isn't a problem in that environment but
it would require spending a ton of time getting that all set up again
and applying myself to develop a proper workflow there. There are a
couple other good reasons to go back to Windows that relates to other
apps that are just not up to snuff on the Mac.

So unfortunately, what you wrote about I've considered from many
angles and tried some ways of getting out of this computer molding me
as opposed to it just being value add and not causing me to spend time
on something more easily done in another way. Your outline of buy such
and such a grocery item and putting it on the iPhone is so right on.
It is just way simpler for me to grab a note pad a write that out and
that's exactly what I do. I still keep my drawer loaded with yellow
stickies, I have a notepad that I use in my consulting practice when
I'm interviewing clients, or for my volunteer work as a clinical
counselor and I need to write notes around issues and although no one
would else would be able to read my case notes as my writing is
atrocious, I can. Plus, often many of my outlines to develop anything,
whether it be how I'll approach a project, write an article or
whatever starts out in a black notebook. It is just so much more
efficient for me to develop things. I might eventually go to Circus
Ponies Notebook to enhance the outline but often not. However, once
I've framed it and start my work, Entourage and SOHO Notes gets used
extensively.

So how to get out of this mess I have with Entourage. I'm going to
think about what you said. Possibly, the best thing is just to bite
the bullet and say this no longer makes sense to work like this.
Rather than obsessing on how to get Entourage to work properly (I do
have an obsessional personality) maybe just go to the simplest and
work backward from the way I used to work which was always effective
for me. I did do extremely well at university and I've often thought
if I had a computer back then it might have actually gotten in my way
as it is a very distracting thing - lets check out Facebook, an e-mail
has come in, my iPhone is beeping and who could that be texting or e-
mailing me and on and on it goes.

Yes, this tech has made some things, no question, for the better. I
often wish I had the access to information that kids have today.
However, that's to a point. There's stuff I'm glad I didn't have
access to as a teenager. Its a fine line but with tech there isn't a
way of drawing that line. If we have addictive personalities tech will
take us to places we really shouldn't be. I've always rented a spare
room I've had over the years. 50% of the people who rent the room are
students. I recall one student, who had a very high IQ, which was
probably his salvation, so addicted to his computer I kept thinking
when does he get his work done. He didn't. The night before an exam
he'd be in such a panic. I was actually having panic attacks with him
as it took me back to when I was a student and if I wasn't well
prepared the night before an exam I'd be a mess. So it never happened.
I was a good crammer but I was always prepared that night before the
exam. This stuff, if I had it then - well I don't know.

I've found of late people have gone text mad. My stupid phone is
beeping all the time. Fortunately, I often don't respond which
eventually stops it. But, sometimes I do and people are having
conversations on this rather than picking up the phone and calling
which is just so much more pleasant and efficient. The amount of time
it takes to have a conversation in text is nuts but people are doing
it.

So Jeff, I'm the type that sometimes needs someone to say Kerry look
so these apps don't quite do what Entourage does. But, is it worth it
to you to spend all this time fussing with them unless you're just
having some fun trying to make something work that can't. I'm part of
the Inner Circle for Intuit working on the beta's for Quicken and the
debate over there is something else. The developer wrote me the other
day and thanked me for my common sense approach and support as the
venom that is spewing in that forum is beyond belief and the developer
just doesn't even like going there as its hard for him to read what
people are saying. I wonder now why can I have this logical approach
when it comes to these things as they affect others and often can't
apply it to myself. I think often I get too attached or wedded to a
construct that just no longer makes sense. Rather than letting go and
saying this is nuts, although I do say its nuts, I still continue on
with the hope that it will sort out. However, life happens and time
passes and I'm missing out on the valuable things as I waste time on
the nonsense.

So, maybe it really is just the time to bite the bullet on Entourage
and let it go. Its back to your final statement: "The question is: is
this a valuable and worthwhile use of my time? That's ultimately the
question
we need to ask... and this question should come before the commitment
to investigate or purchase software." There was a time Entourage did
do what I needed it to do with not much investment in unnecessary
time. Things have changed so maybe therein lies the answer.
 
J

Jeff Chapman

Hello again, Kerry,

Jeff, I like your logic. I like that you are able to step outside the
technology box so to speak and ask is it adding value or taking away
from our quality of life. To be honest, I do ask myself this question
with regards to technology. My decision to return to the Mac in 2003
was predicated on two things 1. I now work as an independent IT
consultant and no longer have to use what I'm told to use 2. I
preferred the Mac, certainly back then, as Windows consumed too much
of my time with updates, crashes, slowness at startup (virus checker
whirls away, Windows is downloading yet more updates and on and on it
goes). So I went back to the Mac and was a happy camper up till I'd
say really when Entourage 2008 came out and then all the questions you
pose but primarily the question what are we trying to do with this
technology (accomplish) and what are we really doing and getting out
of it changed.

Interesting points - I too became disillusioned with Windows
(in particular from Vista onwards) due to the high frequency of
updates and slow startup times, not to mention the poor performance
of many anti-virus applications for Windows overall.
On the other hand, the points that appealed to me on the Mac side
were superior screen text readability, a built-in color calibration
utility, quick startup and shutdown times, ease of application and
driver installation, and general simplicity of form and function.

Now that I've used the Mac heavily for a few years and switched to
the Mac for my work as well, I find that I miss some things I
was previously able to do in Windows. For instance, Finder
isn't quite as robust as Windows Explorer in terms of views
and file/folder operations. I also miss the keyboard accelerators
from Office for Windows - you know, the ALT+E and S to do Paste
Special and so on. That was a real productivity boon,
actually. Granted, Office for Mac also offers keyboard
shortcuts (although they are not customizable in PowerPoint
for some obscure reason), but it's not quite the same as being
able to zip through commands using ALT+F (File), ALT+E (Edit)
and so on.
I found in March of 08 a workaround that allows Entourage to work
somewhat well as a client for mobility. As long as only one module is
enabled for sync, sync's are pretty reliable. Yet, with Entourage,
working this way, you are spending more time making sure if you've
changed the other modules that you remember to switch to them to sync
etc etc. Manual and thus prone to error and then again time consuming.

Interesting - I wasn't aware that Entourage sync malfunctions with two
modules running in tandem. I imagine that overall, the stability is
better than it was last year when Office 2008 was released.
Even so, my experiences last year trying to work out sync issues
left me with enough of a bitter taste in my mouth to just forego
the sync with Entourage entirely. I'm not going back to that!
Your paper and pen analogy is right on here. Some things are just
simpler done the old way. I still use paper and pen and I write with a
fountain pen. I always have. A Mont Blanc fountain pen and my fountain
pen from university is a gold Parker (still have it).

Wow - you mean, one of those pens with refillable ink? :D
I do volunteer
work as a clinical counselor and I couldn't imagine sitting in front
of my client with a computer typing in their most private of details
as they talked. However, I used to work for three years at the Centre
for Addictions and Mental health and they automated everything since I
left and if you sit with a psychiatrist or therapist they busily type
away in their computer. They ask first if you're comfortable with this
as its so beyond the norm of a psychotherapeutic session but hey
technology is even molding them to technology.

Mmm, I can understand what you're saying here. I work as a
project manager, and when we have large meetings, there is inevitably
someone who is typing away on their laptop while someone else is
speaking. You can never tell if they are reading/replying to their emails or
if they are taking notes... For some reason, there is a psychological
barrier that the computer screen places between the listener and
the speaker. Isn't that really peculiar, when you think of it?
When I go to the doctor and he's writing notes on paper, I don't feel
threatened or that he is not listening. But if he's typing something
on the keyboard at the same time, it gives me pause.
So back to Entourage. As a technology it did meet my needs although it
does require more work on my part to do the inputs but the outputs
were worth it. A lot of my work involves research and planning. My
product is always a document. The product is based on information
converted from data. Entourage, due to its linking, categorizing,
project management module and almost SQL type search capability is
able to take the data I input and allow me to convert that to
information. That is, if I've collected a lot of material around
something, its easier to put the pieces together with Entourage than
iCal which might contain the data but its more difficult to ascertain
the relations between one piece and another simply because at best it
only supports boolean searches.

Ah, I can definitely see where you're coming from here.
Entourage's linking functionality is really handy, I've found.
It gives you the ability to build relationships between various
objects in your database, be they tasks, notes, calendar items or
contacts. And that's kind of the way that we humans think, isn't it -
we make mental connections and build internal relations from one
thing to the next. In that context, Entourage is actually
quite useful. One handy trick I've found is to go to Apple System
Preferences - Keyboard and Mouse - Keyboard Shortcuts and add a
shortcut to Edit Links in Entourage.
My hugest beef with the linking functionality in Entourage now
is that you can't see what the item is linked to without actually
opening the link pane. If there was a display somewhere that
automatically showed you what the item is linked to, that would
be much handier. I'm afraid that Outlook for Mac 2010 is probably
not going to fully support this functionality. Outlook for Windows
supports links to other Outlook objects, but you don't get that
handy list, nor are the items updated dynamically to my knowledge :(
In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if making the transition from
Entourage to Outlook is going to trash your links entirely.
We'll have to wait until next year and see how loudly the
early adopters cry. ;-)
With that said though, Entourage has become a time-consumer and as you
say the technology is molding me rather than it easily assisting me
with what I'm trying to accomplish. As you can imagine, with Entourage
working 100% it is more time consuming to categorize, link, apply
records to a project etc but the end result of retrieving that data to
turn it into useful information that would make up my document was
worth it. Now, with Entourage not working well and one having to fuss
with syncs that don't work the way they're supposed to, syncs that
might cause a data mess such as dups or data loss and even a corrupted
DB, the technology is has become an impediment. The technology is
molding the way I work. Generally, I would just be working away,
gathering requirements from a client, doing the research, the
interviews etc etc and then finally developing a my product which as I
mentioned would be a document that is either an analysis of where
something is at, a recommendation to do something etc. Entourage is
actually taking away from the real work and making me work at keeping
Entourage running. It is now working against what I'm trying to
accomplish.

It sounds like it's the syncing bit that is the most troublesome for you.
If Entourage is working as an effective tool otherwise in gathering
and linking information for your documents and projects, maybe
you can just use it in a standalone capacity. I did that for a while.
The other thing I wonder is whether a personal database app like
Bento might not be a suitable option for collecting and relating
various information for your documents. (Have you checked out the
Bento feature list? There are a lot of things there that might
appeal to you - and it syncs to iPhone... just what you need,
eh... more syncing issues! :D )
With this in mind and knowing that mobility is essential to me as
after say a client meeting of whatever type I would enter the
information in my mobile device to be sync'd to Entourage that would
then get manipulated into information, I decided to give the Apple
apps a go. They are very simple to use, fast and make it pretty easy
to input this information on the handheld knowing that it would sync
back to the desktop client reliably without me spending ridiculous
amounts of time fixing a sync mess. The problem I found after two
months of using the Apple apps is that when I went to find my
information to develop my product, it was not so easy. Searches were
leading to multiple hits and I'd have to find what I was really
looking for. I might know that some of these hits were related to the
project I was working on or related to a specific client but tons
wasn't. I now had the laborious task of trying to find information
that was related to that information. It was there it was just more
cumbersome to find. Entourage improves on this modality in that I've
spent time making these connections and it is just a matter of jumping
from one to another and on and on. This is Entourage's strength and
power that I can't replicate with the Apple apps.

Hmm... What information on your mobile device do you need to
sync the most? Tasks, notes, calendar items, contacts? That should be
the major factor that drives your technology needs. If you
know what information you need and what the input and output is
expected to be, you can then get a better picture of the hardware
and software solution that will best meet your needs.

Also, have you considered just using a laptop and foregoing the mobile
device and the accompanying sync issues? I'm not seeing where your
mobile device (iPhone? Blackberry? other cellphone?) fits into the
picture.

Apple doesn't really offer anything ultra-portable in the laptop
area besides the decidedly pricey MacBook Air at present - the
MacBooks are still a little hefty and can give you an aching shoulder
if you carry them around for too long... :eek:
Now this is simply a way I got used to working and it all worked well
till Jan 15 08 when Entourage came out. However, having read what you
said it suddenly dawned on me well I didn't always work this way and I
was quite successful with the way I used to work. I went to College
and University in the 70s and early 80s. I didn't have a computer. I
had to develop very complex papers and I did all that in the library,
with books, microfiche, paper and pen and finally my typewriter (I
felt so lucky I took typing in grade 8 and 9 and was the fastest
typest in the class as this sure paid off in University - I didn't
have to pay someone 20 cents a page to type out my document). The only
thing I kind of fought with was my typing errors and getting the
whiteout in the right spot (again a little technology getting in my
way but certainly nothing of significance).

Well, I would say that everyone is better off with word processors
rather than typewriters... :D I spent my fair share of years with a
typewriter too. Tap tap tap.
So I sit here thinking maybe I should just stop letting Entourage rule
me. Honestly, I've really thought about this way too much. I even
tried an alternate product to see if I could get beyond the power of
the Apple apps but to something somewhat approaching Entourage's
capability. So I got Contactizer Pro and not realizing it too had a
serious issue with sync spent time learning this system only to find
that when sync failed on it boy did it fail. It required a complete de-
install of the whole product and re-install however, I lost all the
links I made. My computer has turned into a massive time consumer and
rather than the value add its been its become for the first time I
think I want to throw this thing out the window.

Contactizer Pro seems like a useful application. I've never tried it
out, but checking the product summary it seems that there are a
lot of features that could come in handy.
But I'm sorry to hear about the syncing issues, and about losing
your links. The same could happen in Entourage as well.

The more I read about your situation, Kerry, the more it seems
that a personal database application with highly customizable
form functionality would better suit your needs.
Bento was the first one that came to my mind - I haven't used
it yet, but it seems promising. With a database application, you should
have far greater flexibility in terms of data structure and
format - and if you don't want to lose those links, it should be
much easier to export your data to a format that other applications
like Excel can read, like CSV for instance (Entourage lacks CSV
export support, or ANY export support besides its own proprietary
format for most items). I actually may end up going this option,
since you can design your own forms to access and link to your
data in the way you prefer, rather than end up stuck with the
preset views and forms of the application you're working with.
There is one final option which doesn't appeal to me at all and that's
to go back to Windows as this isn't a problem in that environment but
it would require spending a ton of time getting that all set up again
and applying myself to develop a proper workflow there. There are a
couple other good reasons to go back to Windows that relates to other
apps that are just not up to snuff on the Mac.

Wanting to return to Windows for some things is understandable;
but then there is the issue of cross-platform compatibility and
passing data between platforms that you will have to consider.
I personally think that you could stick with Mac OS X and just go with
a more customizable application that you can mold to fit your needs.
Entourage (and iCal, in many regards) is really more of a consumer-
level solution as I see it, with few options to really allow you to
personalize your experience. This design is intentional, really -
wouldn't want those pesky users to play around under the hood,
would we? :D
It is just way simpler for me to grab a note pad a write that out and
that's exactly what I do. I still keep my drawer loaded with yellow
stickies, I have a notepad that I use in my consulting practice when
I'm interviewing clients, or for my volunteer work as a clinical
counselor and I need to write notes around issues and although no one
would else would be able to read my case notes as my writing is
atrocious, I can. Plus, often many of my outlines to develop anything,
whether it be how I'll approach a project, write an article or
whatever starts out in a black notebook. It is just so much more
efficient for me to develop things.

Understandable. Actually, starting this year I've switched to a largely
paperless workflow at the office, where I keep no paper notes at all
except at large meetings (to avoid the stigma of being "the guy reading
his email on his laptop during the conference" as mentioned above).
Entourage has been good for just taking and filing notes, and I can
link them to other items in my task list. For actual paper documentation
I receive, I immediately scan them and attach keywords to the PDF in
Acrobat, so that I can find them quickly in Spotlight later.
It's been working out okay here at the office, but I wouldn't be
able to take that with me on any mobile device without major hassle.
All of the linking functionality and relations would be lost.
The other problem is that we don't use Exchange Server at my office
for email, so I'm out of luck with linking any email communications
to things in my Entourage database. So what is going on is that I
have major breaks and kinks in my workflow, where I have to copy and paste
data from one app to another. I chose to use iCal for calendaring
at work and at home, so I cannot use Entourage's calendar either
(unless I want to take my chances with the sync issues, and lose my
categorization and coloring of calendar items).
So how to get out of this mess I have with Entourage. I'm going to
think about what you said. Possibly, the best thing is just to bite
the bullet and say this no longer makes sense to work like this.
Rather than obsessing on how to get Entourage to work properly (I do
have an obsessional personality) maybe just go to the simplest and
work backward from the way I used to work which was always effective
for me. I did do extremely well at university and I've often thought
if I had a computer back then it might have actually gotten in my way
as it is a very distracting thing - lets check out Facebook, an e-mail
has come in, my iPhone is beeping and who could that be texting or e-
mailing me and on and on it goes.

Haha - I can completely relate about wanting to get things right.
I think I also have the tendency to mess with technology and
subconsciously use that futzing process as an excuse for not
actually "GTD" time to time :D
I did ditch Facebook, though, which I found has saved me a little
time during the day. SNS can really be a time hole for sure.
Our relationships with each other have consequently become
more numerous and shallow. I'm not saying that a face-to-face
discussion with someone is the only way to get to know them, but
I also realize that my closest friends are the ones that I have
continued a meaningful, extended dialogue with over the years,
rather than just one-line tweets or witty little Facebook
repartee. Also, I used to text a lot as well on my cellphone,
but I quit that too and it has helped me to feel a little more
in control, more centered in a sense. Again, there are real benefits
in being able to contact people on services like Twitter
and Facebook, but they're not for everyone, and they can require
a significant devotion of time and energy - something that
we find gets correspondingly less as we grow older ;-o
If we have addictive personalities tech will
take us to places we really shouldn't be. I've always rented a spare
room I've had over the years. 50% of the people who rent the room are
students. I recall one student, who had a very high IQ, which was
probably his salvation, so addicted to his computer I kept thinking
when does he get his work done. He didn't. The night before an exam
he'd be in such a panic. I was actually having panic attacks with him
as it took me back to when I was a student and if I wasn't well
prepared the night before an exam I'd be a mess. So it never happened.
I was a good crammer but I was always prepared that night before the
exam. This stuff, if I had it then - well I don't know.

It's fascinating, isn't it, how technology can bring us closer together,
but then conversely rob us of our full potential as we spend more time in
customizing and maintaining said technology.

Sometimes I see people out laying concrete and building frames for
new houses, and I think that they may have a more physically and
psychologically rewarding job than that of the average information
worker these days who has instant access to so many facts.
There is something to be said for pulling yourself away from it
for a time, or limiting your access. To take an example, before I entered
my teens I was fascinated with the then-emerging desktop computer
revolution. So for a time, I was immersed in programming little
BASIC applications and improving my gaming scores.
But then when I became drawn to music, I had little need for
computers at all, and ended up pursuing music as a profession.
I was very productive at that time, I felt, and my creative output
was correspondingly high.
Yet once I started working in the corporate world,
my computer use again increased exponentially, and my energy to do
anything after work decreased in turn. Now I'm trying to pull away
from this maddening cycle, but finding it a major challenge.

I'm not saying that computers rob us of energy, but I guess that
what I am saying is that there is a fine balance to be struck between
using the computer and the computer using you, as you would
probably agree.
Windows got to be that way for me as you also mentioned - all that
time spent in updating things, tweaking the registry and finding
applications to help me do the things I wanted to do.
(Windows 7 seems to be a refreshing change, however, if not perfect.)
In the end, I realized that my needs were pretty simple, and I
had let my curiosity drive my purchases rather than my creative
needs.
I've found of late people have gone text mad. My stupid phone is
beeping all the time. Fortunately, I often don't respond which
eventually stops it. But, sometimes I do and people are having
conversations on this rather than picking up the phone and calling
which is just so much more pleasant and efficient. The amount of time
it takes to have a conversation in text is nuts but people are doing
it.

Actually, I find that I have more relaxing relations nowadays with
people when I don't rely on email or text messaging. I do get complaints
dripping with sarcasm ("well, you dropped your email service on your cell,
so I can't contact you THAT way"), but it is actually nice to talk to
someone briefly, even if just to confirm an appointment or a meeting
time. At the office, although I pass documents to the management via
email and via private network, my manager usually always calls me
on the phone to confirm and discuss the document, rather than
sending an email reply.
I can say that this has helped greatly to reduce misunderstandings,
even though it is admittedly a PITA and even added stress to have
to deal with frequent phone calls.
So Jeff, I'm the type that sometimes needs someone to say Kerry look
so these apps don't quite do what Entourage does. But, is it worth it
to you to spend all this time fussing with them unless you're just
having some fun trying to make something work that can't. I'm part of
the Inner Circle for Intuit working on the beta's for Quicken and the
debate over there is something else. The developer wrote me the other
day and thanked me for my common sense approach and support as the
venom that is spewing in that forum is beyond belief and the developer
just doesn't even like going there as its hard for him to read what
people are saying. I wonder now why can I have this logical approach
when it comes to these things as they affect others and often can't
apply it to myself.

You seem to have an even and very fair point of view on things, Kerry -
that is quite a welcome trait in the world of software and
product development, among many other professions.
So, maybe it really is just the time to bite the bullet on Entourage
and let it go. Its back to your final statement: "The question is: is
this a valuable and worthwhile use of my time? That's ultimately the
question
we need to ask... and this question should come before the commitment
to investigate or purchase software." There was a time Entourage did
do what I needed it to do with not much investment in unnecessary
time. Things have changed so maybe therein lies the answer.

Again, for a practical solution, I would think that a customizable
personal database solution such as Bento (just one example)
rather than a "do-it-all" integrated email client/calendar/task solution
might work a lot better for you (and for me!) in the long run.
The heart of every database is basically just rows and columns
of data, be it numbers, text, images, file attachments or whatnot.
Using Entourage to store that database will lock you in
completely to that platform with no chance of getting out.
On the other hand, switching to a database application that
can work cross-platform with Excel, SQL and CSV data both ways
will greatly enhance the usefulness and longevity of your data.
Entourage is in such a sorry state of affairs when it comes
to cross-platform compatibility.

I really would like to have a long talk with the developers at the
Mac BU as to why they chose such a heavily proprietary format for
Entourage's database and functionality. I can't even push my
task data out into Excel without manually copying and pasting
records one at a time... and the fields don't even get carried
along. CSV is out of the question - no CSV export functionality
is offered in Entourage. Outlook for Mac 2010/2011 will possibly be better,
but you will still be stuck with the proprietary core database
format, namely .pst instead of .rge. So ultimately, if the
database is screwed, you're screwed.
Alas, I rant.

Ideally, how you want to view and link that data should be decided by
you and you alone, not by the manufacturer of the software you use.
Eventually, you may need to compromise somewhere along the line,
but being able to create and customize your own views and forms
to selectively pull out and manipulate the data you want to work
with might be an ultimately more productive solution, even if
it takes some time and forethought to set up in the beginning.

I've enjoyed hearing your thoughts about all of these things
so far! It's uncommon to find users who are thinking beyond
the box in front of them...

Jeff
 
C

Corentin Cras-Méneur

Kerry said:
Corentin, I know you are one of the people that stuck with Entourage
and didn't dump it. Can I ask what keeps you in Entourage as I know
sync is important to you also.

Sync is critical to me, so these issues hit me hard!
I use still Entourage because it has, by far, the best Exchange support.
It also has the best search capability there is. Being able to restrict
the Spotlight searches is really nice and something Mail would need
badly.

I *also* use Mail though. I think Mail by itself is weak, but if you add
Mail Act-On and MailTags, it all the sudden becomes a far more powerful
e-mail client.

In any case, using two e-mail client helps me organize things and keep
personal e-mails separated from work ones.

Corentin
 
K

Kerry

Sync is critical to me, so these issues hit me hard!
I use still Entourage because it has, by far, the best Exchange support.
It also has the best search capability there is. Being able to restrict
the Spotlight searches is really nice and something Mail would need
badly.

I *also* use Mail though. I think Mail by itself is weak, but if you add
Mail Act-On and MailTags, it all the sudden becomes a far more powerful
e-mail client.

In any case, using two e-mail client helps me organize things and keep
personal e-mails separated from work ones.

Corentin

--
          --- Office:Mac MVP  http://www.cortig.net/wordpress/---
       http://www.mvps.org      -    http://mvp.support..microsoft.com
    MVPs are not MS employees    -    Les MVP ne travaillent pas pour MS
 Remove "NoSpam" to e-mail me    -      Retirez "NoSpam" pourm'écrire

Hi Corentin, yes your points on Entourage are exactly what I've found.
Its just way more powerful, even as an e-mail client, than Mail. I
looked at those two apps you mentioned for mail and although they look
good they're pricey. Best just to stay with Entourage as an e-mail
client as it is good.

If you're in an exchange environment I can of course see why Entourage
is important. I suspect the move to Outlook in the next release of
Office will give you a far superior exchange client than even what
you've got with Entourage.

For me, the only issue I have with Entourage is this whole sync thing.
By just using it without Notes, as I add a lot of Notes so I do this
with Markspace Notes now, I can just leave the sync module turned on
to Calendar and Tasks. Syncs are pretty reliable under this scenario.
Its rare I change Contacts so that when I do this is only a very
occassional thing where I need to switch modules. However, it would be
so nice if sync just worked the way it was supposed to in the
beginning. I'm really not concerned so much about categories sync'g
across as calendars etc and then to my iPhone or Palm TX in colour as
you can't search on these anyway. That everything in my calendar and
tasks is one colour doesn't bother me at all. That they've never
resolved sync so that it works the way its supposed to does. I know
now this is a far bigger issue than Microsoft alone but I really think
with Microsoft's clout, even if they needed Apple to do something with
sync services, they could have probably pulled this off. Since Outlook
will have a whole different DB schema oriented to the new Mac
architecture, our sync problems may disappear with that product. I'm
just hoping some of the nifty stuff that's in Entourage such as links
remains as the Outlook version I have (2002) doesn't use links but
rather hypertext and I don't find that nearly as effective.

I also use mail as I like to use that to keep a different e-mail
account in that receives a ton of newsletters etc that I don't want
coming into Entourage. So I know mail well and although it works well
and fast its not nearly as good as Entourage's mail client. Those apps
you mentioned would be handy but I really don't want to shell out over
$50 for this stuff. I think I'm going to have to buy another backup
program as Data Backup (Prosoft) are having one heck of a time getting
their program to work with Snow Leopard. They just keep saying a fix
is coming soon so I've been doing something entirely different, which
is more manual, for my additional backup. However, if they don't get
this fixed soon I'm going to have to shell out probably $60 for
Retrospect and I just don't feel like spending all this money on
software at the moment.

Anyway, thanks for your response. I knew sync was important to you and
I was curious what was keeping you in Entourage. Your reason makes
perfect sense.
 
K

Kerry

Hello again, Kerry,



Interesting points - I too became disillusioned with Windows
(in particular from Vista onwards) due to the high frequency of
updates and slow startup times, not to mention the poor performance
of many anti-virus applications for Windows overall.
On the other hand, the points that appealed to me on the Mac side
were superior screen text readability, a built-in color calibration
utility, quick startup and shutdown times, ease of application and
driver installation, and general simplicity of form and function.

Now that I've used the Mac heavily for a few years and switched to
the Mac for my work as well, I find that I miss some things I
was previously able to do in Windows. For instance, Finder
isn't quite as robust as Windows Explorer in terms of views
and file/folder operations. I also miss the keyboard accelerators
from Office for Windows - you know, the ALT+E and S to do Paste
Special and so on. That was a real productivity boon,
actually. Granted, Office for Mac also offers keyboard
shortcuts (although they are not customizable in PowerPoint
for some obscure reason), but it's not quite the same as being
able to zip through commands using ALT+F (File), ALT+E (Edit)
and so on.


Interesting - I wasn't aware that Entourage sync malfunctions with two
modules running in tandem. I imagine that overall, the stability is
better than it was last year when Office 2008 was released.
Even so, my experiences last year trying to work out sync issues
left me with enough of a bitter taste in my mouth to just forego
the sync with Entourage entirely. I'm not going back to that!


Wow - you mean, one of those pens with refillable ink? :D


Mmm, I can understand what you're saying here. I work as a
project manager, and when we have large meetings, there is inevitably
someone who is typing away on their laptop while someone else is
speaking. You can never tell if they are reading/replying to their emailsor
if they are taking notes... For some reason, there is a psychological
barrier that the computer screen places between the listener and
the speaker. Isn't that really peculiar, when you think of it?
When I go to the doctor and he's writing notes on paper, I don't feel
threatened or that he is not listening. But if he's typing something
on the keyboard at the same time, it gives me pause.


Ah, I can definitely see where you're coming from here.
Entourage's linking functionality is really handy, I've found.
It gives you the ability to build relationships between various
objects in your database, be they tasks, notes, calendar items or
contacts. And that's kind of the way that we humans think, isn't it -
we make mental connections and build internal relations from one
thing to the next. In that context, Entourage is actually
quite useful. One handy trick I've found is to go to Apple System
Preferences - Keyboard and Mouse - Keyboard Shortcuts and add a
shortcut to Edit Links in Entourage.
My hugest beef with the linking functionality in Entourage now
is that you can't see what the item is linked to without actually
opening the link pane. If there was a display somewhere that
automatically showed you what the item is linked to, that would
be much handier. I'm afraid that Outlook for Mac 2010 is probably
not going to fully support this functionality. Outlook for Windows
supports links to other Outlook objects, but you don't get that
handy list, nor are the items updated dynamically to my knowledge :(
In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if making the transition from
Entourage to Outlook is going to trash your links entirely.
We'll have to wait until next year and see how loudly the
early adopters cry. ;-)




It sounds like it's the syncing bit that is the most troublesome for you.
If Entourage is working as an effective tool otherwise in gathering
and linking information for your documents and projects, maybe
you can just use it in a standalone capacity. I did that for a while.
The other thing I wonder is whether a personal database app like
Bento might not be a suitable option for collecting and relating
various information for your documents. (Have you checked out the
Bento feature list? There are a lot of things there that might
appeal to you - and it syncs to iPhone... just what you need,
eh... more syncing issues! :D )




Hmm... What information on your mobile device do you need to
sync the most? ...

read more »

Hi Jeff, thanks for all the feedback. That's great. I have thought of
Bento and played with it but it really isn't quite for me. I've used
Filemaker for as long as I can remember and when I need DB
functionality I tend to use that. Since I've used it so long, it
really doesn't take me long to build something. For a new user though
Bento is probably the way to go if they don't have extensive DB
requirements. Filemaker though kind of doesn't cut it for me as an
Information Manager as does Entourage. So Entourage is my workhorse.
Filemaker DB's are designed for specific things - such as psychometric
questionnaires, tracking of specific stuff against a person or a
company etc. Entourage is more fluid and free form allowing me to
input anything and relate that to anything else in Entourage. You're
very right about Entourage. It is an extremely closed system and as
such it will be around forever. There's no way to get the information
out of it in a tab delimitted file to export to something else.
Possibly when Microsoft replaces Outlook with Entourage they'll have a
file converter that will allow for data migration. If not, Entourage
will just have to sit here so that I can go back and look at
information created.

Yes, if you have one module turned on only as opposed to two or three
the sync's are relatively reliable. Once you turn on more than one
module you'll get all kinds of bizarre behavior. If you don't care
about categories coming across to your mobile device and in my case I
don't as you can't search on them then this can work. Where it becomes
problematic is if you're constantly creating information in other
modules and you constantly need to switch modules for single module
sync'g. In my case, I add a lot of notes so to get around this I use
Markspace Notes for Notes I need on my Palm TX and iPhone both using
Missing Sync. Contacts rarely change so this isn't a big issue as
changing modules occurs rarely. Its just would have been nice if
Entourage worked the way it was supposed to and then we could just use
the one environment for everything without all this nonsense.

I think because of what happened with Entourage and sync's primarily,
people went off in many directions with this early last year. I know
Microsoft continually gets support calls on the issue and I see new
users post questions even today that old users were posting in Jan/Feb/
March of last year. No, there has been no improvement in Entourage in
all this time. This workaround I mentioned was discovered back in
March of 2008 its just not everyone is aware of it. Markspace is but
they also know not everyone is aware of it.

In terms of Windows 7, I did load it in Parallels and its nice. I
think Microsoft did a good job of it. However, its not something I
would want to run continuously in Parallels as this uses a ton of
resources.

Thanks for saying I'm kind of level on all this. I tend to get
obsessed sometimes with fixing something and in the case of Entourage
unfortunately it was never fixable. I kept hoping Microsoft would get
it fixed though. Due to the nature of the problems with sync, I've
tended to spend way too much time keeping this thing running. However,
as you were able to note, the way I've used Entourage is in a manner
that just can't be replicated with the Apple apps.

In terms of Contactizer Pro, as you found, I found that it looked like
it might be a product that could replicate some of the functionality I
have with Entourage. When I started working with it, it wasn't bad and
although it wasn't an Entourage I felt it could fill the bill.
However, Objective-Decisions also has serious problems with sync
services and there answer is to not write to it at all but rather
iCal. The one thing you might like in it based on one thing you said
is that if you click on an item, in a pane below it will show you all
the linked items. On the other hand, it has some rough edges and there
are a few things about it that don't make sense in the way it works.
However, again, if it weren't for the sync issues, this would have
been an alright alternative to Entourage.

So I think now we need to wait for Outlook and hope that it works
alright with sync. I hope though they keep some of the good things
about Entourage in Outlook that I find better and one is linking. The
Project Management facility is also nice in Entourage. However, I do
like the architectural direction they're taking with Outlook in that
it will work better with OSX's architecture and will get away from
this monolithic database and be better suited to backups. I suspect it
will be far less prone to DB corruption as a result.

So we march on Jeff and try to break ourselves from our technology fix
and tinkering and get back to real human interaction and productivity
whether that be just reading a good book. It sounds to me like you see
well the positive and the negatives of the way this tech has affected
us and have made some nice adjustments or try like I do to have this
work for us but still maintain healthy human interaction and function
that hopefully brings us a little peace :)
 
C

Corentin Cras-Méneur

Kerry said:
If you're in an exchange environment I can of course see why Entourage
is important. I suspect the move to Outlook in the next release of
Office will give you a far superior exchange client than even what
you've got with Entourage.

Well to be honest, I suspect it is more rebranding than anything. It
will sure have improvements for Exchange, but it will be built on the
same bases as Entourage (I suspect).
I doubt they will start Outlook for Mac from scratch. The database
format will be new though, that at least has been announced.

The same way Entourage itself was built on the ashes of Outlook Express.

[...]
Since Outlook
will have a whole different DB schema oriented to the new Mac
architecture, our sync problems may disappear with that product.

Yeah, we can only hope... I'm not so sure.
I think the Sync issues are deep and I don't think changing the database
format in Entourage will really correct the underlying issues with the
guts of SyncServices.

I also use mail as I like to use that to keep a different e-mail
account in that receives a ton of newsletters etc that I don't want
coming into Entourage. So I know mail well and although it works well
and fast its not nearly as good as Entourage's mail client. Those apps
you mentioned would be handy but I really don't want to shell out over
$50 for this stuff.

And I can understand that.
I think I'm going to have to buy another backup
program as Data Backup (Prosoft) are having one heck of a time getting
their program to work with Snow Leopard.

Their app is also buggy as hell. I tried it and decided to stay away
from it.

[...]
However, if they don't get
this fixed soon I'm going to have to shell out probably $60 for
Retrospect and I just don't feel like spending all this money on
software at the moment.

Not a huge fan of Retrospect either (though I haven't used the new
version).
I've used Synk and DejaVu with some success though. They are more
limited than Retrospect, for sure, but they might suit your needs.


Corentin
 
D

Diane Ross

I think I'm going to have to buy another backup
program as Data Backup (Prosoft) are having one heck of a time getting
their program to work with Snow Leopard.

Have you looked at SuperDuper? He's never charged for an update. It's user
friendly and it actually works. :)

One of the options in SuperDuper! is to create what the author calls a
"Sandbox". It's used to revert to pre-update state of your OS. Here's a
description of how this option works:

A Sandbox is a bootable copy of your system, stored on another hard drive or
partition, that shares your personal documents and data with the original.
With SuperDuper!, you actually use the Sandbox as your startup volume. You
can safely install any system updates, drivers or programs in the Sandbox,
without worrying about what might happen to your system. If anything goes
wrong, you can simply start up from the original system. SuperDuper! has
preserved it in its original, pre-disaster state but all your new and
changed personal documents are totally up to date. Within minutes, you're up
and running again without having to go through a difficult and
time-consuming restore process.

SuperDuper! Is $27.95. I¹m not affiliated with the product. Just a satisfied
user. <http://www.shirt-pocket.com/>
 
K

Kerry

Diane said:
Have you looked at SuperDuper?
Thanks Diane. Yes, I use SuperDuper! I've used it for as long as I can
remember. I use it primarily as a clone backup and although I may
restore a file from it I'm more like to get my file from another
system such as Time Machine. I use it to boot into and run maintenance
routines like repair disk and I run Techtools Pro from it once a month
and run through all its maintenance routines. I also like rebuilding
the volume monthly and either every 6 months to a year I'll defrag
both my files followed by the volumes.

So SuperDuper! is a great program, works flawlessly and easily and
worked with Snow Leopard almost a soon as the OS came out. Also, Dave
Nanian has been a great source of information and help (the developer).

I do like though one additional program in my mix that does historical
archived backups. It used to be Retrospect then a couple of years ago
I switched to Data Backup. However, they still can't get this working
with Snow Leopard and it isn't cheap. I don't know what their problem
is but I think the developers gone missing which is a bit scary with
backup software. So I'm considering this software called Get Backup 2
which is very easy to use and does exactly what I want and I've tested
it thoroughly and its fully reliable (runs every night at 3:15 am all
programs shut down) and restores Entourage fine. I'm also eligible for
a Retrospect upgrade at $60 and I participated in their beta and
although its a powerful program its complex and I'd say really is way
more suited to a networked environment rather than a standalone,
individual situation. However, when I used Retrospect 6.1 for years I
never had a bad restore but I'd say overki
 
D

Diane Ross

I do like though one additional program in my mix that does historical
archived backups.

A free solution is to use a folder action, FolderOrgX.

FolderOrg is an AppleScript Folder Action that organizes files and folders
by moving them into dated subfolders. This is helpful in keeping files and
folders organized by the day they were added, not created or modified.

To install:

Drag "FolderOrg X" file into folder "/Library/Scripts/Folder Action
Scripts/"

Enable Folder actions when you launch Folder Actions Setup (in services or
contextual menu depending on OS you are using.)

Add action to folder.

<http://homepage.mac.com/dougeverly/folderorg.html>

I do this for a weekly backup of my contacts, daily backup of Entourage and
other backups of files that are critical for me.

It's also great on your downloads and screen snaps folders.
 
J

Jeff Chapman

Hello Kerry,

For me, the only issue I have with Entourage is this whole sync thing.
By just using it without Notes, as I add a lot of Notes so I do this
with Markspace Notes now, I can just leave the sync module turned on
to Calendar and Tasks. Syncs are pretty reliable under this scenario.
Its rare I change Contacts so that when I do this is only a very
occassional thing where I need to switch modules. However, it would be
so nice if sync just worked the way it was supposed to in the
beginning. I'm really not concerned so much about categories sync'g
across as calendars etc and then to my iPhone or Palm TX in colour as
you can't search on these anyway. That everything in my calendar and
tasks is one colour doesn't bother me at all.

Actually, this whole discussion has really started to get me
thinking again about the value of Entourage for collecting and
relating information in a sort of personal database, if you will.
I had bad luck with syncing iCal to Entourage last year,
but I thought that maybe with all of the Apple and Microsoft Office
updates since then, the situation might have changed.

I was actually pleasantly surprised to find that syncing now
between iCal and Entourage works much better than it did a year ago.
Calendar items can be moved around, deleted, duplicated,
and renamed, and Entourage will follow suit.
You can even add categories to an appointment on the calendar
in Entourage, add Entourage-specific fields such as travel time,
categories, and projects, and iCal will still recognize the calendar item
as being the same one, only that iCal doesn't have those fields to
display.

The other minor drawback I found was that if you have a task in
Entourage, assign it to a project (let's say "market research" as
an example), and then drag that task (to-do) from the iCal to-do
list to the iCal calendar, it will not be associated with the original
"marketing research" project in Entourage.
Of course, there is also the long-standing issue of being limited
to the use of the "Entourage" calendar - you only get one calendar
in Entourage, as it doesn't support multiple calendars.
But otherwise, it works much better now than I previously
remembered.

So you use notes in MarkSpace Notes and not Entourage, then?
You mentioned that there are sync problems when you have
more than one module on in Entourage.

Jeff
 
D

Diane Ross

iCal will still recognize the calendar item
as being the same one, only that iCal doesn't have those fields to
display.

Check out this script

Sync Entourage & AB Groups (Donationware)



<http://www.jonn8.com/html/SyncEntourageABGroups.html>



This script resolves these issues. It will go through your contacts in
Entourage, determine the name of the categories to which they are assigned
and will place the same contacts in Address Book in matching groups (it will
create the groups if they do not already exist). The script will also set
the "my card" flag for your contact.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top