What website design software?

K

Karin

I am recreating my website (using Publisher 98). I am using a tile background
that I got from the internet. On top of that I have inserted a text box with
a gradient fill and frame. Inside there I have inserted another text box
that is white with a frame. I am inserting pictures and text inside the
white text box. Problem is the pictures show up very blotchy when doing a
web preview. Publisher converts everything to a gif file.

I would like to invest in a new web site design program, but I want to make
sure that when I do layering like mention above I won't have the same
problem. Any recommendations on website design software that will do what I
want and is not too difficult to use?
 
M

Mike Koewler

Karin,

Take a long look at Serif WebPlus. It is not unlike Pub, as far as how
it works, so there is no long learning curve as far as importing images
or placing text.

Unlike Pub, it loves Master Pages and you have to really try to turn
block of text links on a background to an image so the links won't work
(but you can do it if you really want). It has built-in wizards for
e-commerce (using PayPal, Mal's E-commerce and another one (can't recall
its name).

If the program looks appealing to you, instead of buying it straight
off, download the free version (WebPlus 6) from
www.freeserifsoftware.com which is almost worth its cost. Register it,
wait a couple of weeks and the Lovely Natasha was send you a fantastic
offer to upgrade to the newest version for $40 or so.

Mike
 
D

DavidF

You can layer design objects and elements in Publisher after version 2000,
so you could consider Pub 2007. Just remember that there are things you can
do in a print document that will not convert to html regardless of what
program you choose to use. Print and Web are two different media and you
have to design accordingly.

If you do decide to buy Pub 2007, I would suggest that when you install it,
you do a custom install, and choose to keep Pub 98 installed and not
overwrite it. You may have problems opening Pub 98 publications in 2007, and
if you use a lot of word art, that has been changed. You can have multiple
versions of Publisher running on the same machine.

As to other programs, Web Plus is a good choice as Mike suggests.
http://www.nvu.com/ is a free open source program. Web Expression is a
spendy replacement program for FrontPage, and....

Good luck.

DavidF
 
K

Karin

David, could you explain about print document vs web. My website is
presently 47 pages and I use lots of photos. I also like to use animated
gifs. I would like to know that when I use a particular font, it not only
shows the correct font on my web preview, but when it is viewed on another
computer as well. I was thinking that if I used another web program that
maybe I could accomplish this. Am I wrong? My web design knowledge is
limited to what I have learned using Pub. 98.
 
R

Rob Giordano \(Crash\)

You're wrong, only fonts that the viewer has installed on their machine will
display, if they don't have a font that you used a default font will
display. Google: " web safe fonts"

You can use special fonts if you convert them to images, but you'd not want
to do this for anything but headings or something special because search
engines can't read text in an image...not to mention server overhead.

Designing for print is a world away from designing for the web!...maybe a
universe away.



--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Rob Giordano
Microsoft MVP Expression





| David, could you explain about print document vs web. My website is
| presently 47 pages and I use lots of photos. I also like to use animated
| gifs. I would like to know that when I use a particular font, it not only
| shows the correct font on my web preview, but when it is viewed on another
| computer as well. I was thinking that if I used another web program that
| maybe I could accomplish this. Am I wrong? My web design knowledge is
| limited to what I have learned using Pub. 98.
|
| "DavidF" wrote:
|
| > You can layer design objects and elements in Publisher after version
2000,
| > so you could consider Pub 2007. Just remember that there are things you
can
| > do in a print document that will not convert to html regardless of what
| > program you choose to use. Print and Web are two different media and you
| > have to design accordingly.
| >
| > If you do decide to buy Pub 2007, I would suggest that when you install
it,
| > you do a custom install, and choose to keep Pub 98 installed and not
| > overwrite it. You may have problems opening Pub 98 publications in 2007,
and
| > if you use a lot of word art, that has been changed. You can have
multiple
| > versions of Publisher running on the same machine.
| >
| > As to other programs, Web Plus is a good choice as Mike suggests.
| > http://www.nvu.com/ is a free open source program. Web Expression is a
| > spendy replacement program for FrontPage, and....
| >
| > Good luck.
| >
| > DavidF
| >
| > | > >I am recreating my website (using Publisher 98). I am using a tile
| > >background
| > > that I got from the internet. On top of that I have inserted a text
box
| > > with
| > > a gradient fill and frame. Inside there I have inserted another text
box
| > > that is white with a frame. I am inserting pictures and text inside
the
| > > white text box. Problem is the pictures show up very blotchy when
doing a
| > > web preview. Publisher converts everything to a gif file.
| > >
| > > I would like to invest in a new web site design program, but I want to
| > > make
| > > sure that when I do layering like mention above I won't have the same
| > > problem. Any recommendations on website design software that will do
what
| > > I
| > > want and is not too difficult to use?
| >
| >
| >
 
D

DavidF

Karin,

In addition to what Rob said about web fonts, Publisher will either convert
non-web fonts to an image automatically, or may substitute in a web font
when viewed. There are 11 web fonts. Reference:
About Web fonts and font schemes:
http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/publisher/HP010174931033.aspx?pid=CH063575481033
The point is that no matter what program you use to build your site, if you
use non-web fonts on your page, the results will be the same.

Animated GIFS are supported in newer versions of Publisher, and you can
overlap text boxes and other design elements without converting all the
elements to a new non-animated GIF. You can layer images on top of text
boxes in 2007, where in Pub 98 through 2000, this would be converted to a
common GIF.

However, you cannot use "word wrap" in a web publication. This is an example
of a print format, that doesn't convert correctly to html. In Pub 98, if you
wrapped an image with text, you would get a combined image of the text and
the original image with the text wrapped around the image. In 2007, you get
an image on top of the text, and the text remains text.

Other examples of print formatting that chokes Publisher when you convert to
html would include most paragraph spacing and special formatting, tables are
converted to an image, some bulleted lists, some odd sized fonts, some
columns, some gradient fills, some custom borders, and... You also will find
that some things work when your website is viewed in IE, but don't work in
FireFox and other browsers, so you also have to modify your design so that
it has cross browser support. I can't provide a complete list, nor can I say
that other programs might not be able to workaround these formatting issues,
but in general some "print formatting" will cause problems and require you
to design around what you can and cannot do....and what you should and
should not do.

You could use underlines for emphasis in a print document, but in a web
document that would tell the viewer that is supposed to be a hyperlink. You
would probably layout a print document 8.5 inches wide...or paper width
wide, but you don't want your web pages so wide that it requires the viewer
to scroll side to side. Publisher produces a fixed width, left justified
page, while other programs can produce variable widths and self centering
pages. You can use a high resolution image in a print document, but need a
lower resolution image that loads quickly in a web document. You can use
shadows, embossing, etc. in a print doc, but will not get the same effect in
a web doc. Look at your local newspaper, and then look at the online
version...that is a good example of formatting and designing for print vs.
web media. Part of it is not being able to convert to html, and part of it
is simply the different mediums, but less to do with the program you use to
build your web site.

Publisher is primarily a DTP, with limited web building capability and is
intended for relatively small, simple, static web sites. If you work within
its limitations you can produce an effective and attractive web site, but it
will never have the capability of a program that is designed specifically
for web building. It all depends on the goals and the scope of what you want
out of a web site as to whether Publisher is an acceptable choice.

DavidF
 
D

DavidF

Velllly interesting. Sounds like even if you are careful and use a generally
"safe" web font, it won't always work. I also didn't realize the Linux was
so limited.

Thanks.

DavidF
 
K

Karin

I agree. Really interesting statistics. So if I want to use lets say, the
"Edwardian Script" at the top of my web pages the best thing would be to put
it in an image form?

"Publisher is primarily a DTP, with limited web building capability and is
ntended for relatively small, simple, static web sites".

If I want to to be a bit more creative, what other programs would work? I
have seen several people I know have website built with various issues of
"Frontpage" software. I was thinking about Frontpage, but it is my
understanding that something new is coming out to take it's place. Not sure
how difficult it is to use.
 
R

Rob Giordano \(Crash\)

FrontPage is retired, but will still be supported for several years.
FrontPage has been replaced with Expression Web...there is a free trial so
you may want to download it and see if you like it.



--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Rob Giordano
Microsoft MVP Expression





|I agree. Really interesting statistics. So if I want to use lets say,
the
| "Edwardian Script" at the top of my web pages the best thing would be to
put
| it in an image form?
|
| "Publisher is primarily a DTP, with limited web building capability and is
| ntended for relatively small, simple, static web sites".
|
| If I want to to be a bit more creative, what other programs would work? I
| have seen several people I know have website built with various issues of
| "Frontpage" software. I was thinking about Frontpage, but it is my
| understanding that something new is coming out to take it's place. Not
sure
| how difficult it is to use.
|
|
|
| "DavidF" wrote:
|
| > Velllly interesting. Sounds like even if you are careful and use a
generally
| > "safe" web font, it won't always work. I also didn't realize the Linux
was
| > so limited.
| >
| > Thanks.
| >
| > DavidF
| >
| > | > > David (and Rob),
| > >
| > > Here's an interesting site regarding fonts and which are installed on
| > > systems: http://www.visibone.com/font/FontResults.html. It includes
PCs,
| > > Macs and Linux browsers. Another site, Windows only, is
| > > http://www.codestyle.org/css/font-family/sampler-WindowsResults.shtml
| > >
| > > Mike
| > >
| > > DavidF wrote:
| > >> Karin,
| > >>
| > >> In addition to what Rob said about web fonts, Publisher will either
| > >> convert non-web fonts to an image automatically, or may substitute in
a
| > >> web font when viewed. There are 11 web fonts. Reference:
| > >> About Web fonts and font schemes:
| > >>
http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/publisher/HP010174931033.aspx?pid=CH063575481033
| > >> The point is that no matter what program you use to build your site,
if
| > >> you use non-web fonts on your page, the results will be the same.
| > >>
| > >> Animated GIFS are supported in newer versions of Publisher, and you
can
| > >> overlap text boxes and other design elements without converting all
the
| > >> elements to a new non-animated GIF. You can layer images on top of
text
| > >> boxes in 2007, where in Pub 98 through 2000, this would be converted
to a
| > >> common GIF.
| > >>
| > >> However, you cannot use "word wrap" in a web publication. This is an
| > >> example of a print format, that doesn't convert correctly to html. In
Pub
| > >> 98, if you wrapped an image with text, you would get a combined image
of
| > >> the text and the original image with the text wrapped around the
image.
| > >> In 2007, you get an image on top of the text, and the text remains
text.
| > >>
| > >> Other examples of print formatting that chokes Publisher when you
convert
| > >> to html would include most paragraph spacing and special formatting,
| > >> tables are converted to an image, some bulleted lists, some odd sized
| > >> fonts, some columns, some gradient fills, some custom borders, and...
You
| > >> also will find that some things work when your website is viewed in
IE,
| > >> but don't work in FireFox and other browsers, so you also have to
modify
| > >> your design so that it has cross browser support. I can't provide a
| > >> complete list, nor can I say that other programs might not be able to
| > >> workaround these formatting issues, but in general some "print
| > >> formatting" will cause problems and require you to design around what
you
| > >> can and cannot do....and what you should and should not do.
| > >>
| > >> You could use underlines for emphasis in a print document, but in a
web
| > >> document that would tell the viewer that is supposed to be a
hyperlink.
| > >> You would probably layout a print document 8.5 inches wide...or paper
| > >> width wide, but you don't want your web pages so wide that it
requires
| > >> the viewer to scroll side to side. Publisher produces a fixed width,
left
| > >> justified page, while other programs can produce variable widths and
self
| > >> centering pages. You can use a high resolution image in a print
document,
| > >> but need a lower resolution image that loads quickly in a web
document.
| > >> You can use shadows, embossing, etc. in a print doc, but will not get
the
| > >> same effect in a web doc. Look at your local newspaper, and then look
at
| > >> the online version...that is a good example of formatting and
designing
| > >> for print vs. web media. Part of it is not being able to convert to
html,
| > >> and part of it is simply the different mediums, but less to do with
the
| > >> program you use to build your web site.
| > >>
| > >> Publisher is primarily a DTP, with limited web building capability
and is
| > >> intended for relatively small, simple, static web sites. If you work
| > >> within its limitations you can produce an effective and attractive
web
| > >> site, but it will never have the capability of a program that is
designed
| > >> specifically for web building. It all depends on the goals and the
scope
| > >> of what you want out of a web site as to whether Publisher is an
| > >> acceptable choice.
| > >>
| > >> DavidF
| > >>
| > >> | > >>
| > >>>David, could you explain about print document vs web. My website is
| > >>>presently 47 pages and I use lots of photos. I also like to use
animated
| > >>>gifs. I would like to know that when I use a particular font, it not
| > >>>only
| > >>>shows the correct font on my web preview, but when it is viewed on
| > >>>another
| > >>>computer as well. I was thinking that if I used another web program
that
| > >>>maybe I could accomplish this. Am I wrong? My web design knowledge
is
| > >>>limited to what I have learned using Pub. 98.
| > >>>
| > >>>"DavidF" wrote:
| > >>>
| > >>>
| > >>>>You can layer design objects and elements in Publisher after version
| > >>>>2000,
| > >>>>so you could consider Pub 2007. Just remember that there are things
you
| > >>>>can
| > >>>>do in a print document that will not convert to html regardless of
what
| > >>>>program you choose to use. Print and Web are two different media and
you
| > >>>>have to design accordingly.
| > >>>>
| > >>>>If you do decide to buy Pub 2007, I would suggest that when you
install
| > >>>>it,
| > >>>>you do a custom install, and choose to keep Pub 98 installed and not
| > >>>>overwrite it. You may have problems opening Pub 98 publications in
2007,
| > >>>>and
| > >>>>if you use a lot of word art, that has been changed. You can have
| > >>>>multiple
| > >>>>versions of Publisher running on the same machine.
| > >>>>
| > >>>>As to other programs, Web Plus is a good choice as Mike suggests.
| > >>>>http://www.nvu.com/ is a free open source program. Web Expression is
a
| > >>>>spendy replacement program for FrontPage, and....
| > >>>>
| > >>>>Good luck.
| > >>>>
| > >>>>DavidF
| > >>>>
| > >>>>| > >>>>
| > >>>>>I am recreating my website (using Publisher 98). I am using a tile
| > >>>>>background
| > >>>>>that I got from the internet. On top of that I have inserted a
text
| > >>>>>box
| > >>>>>with
| > >>>>>a gradient fill and frame. Inside there I have inserted another
text
| > >>>>>box
| > >>>>>that is white with a frame. I am inserting pictures and text
inside
| > >>>>>the
| > >>>>>white text box. Problem is the pictures show up very blotchy when
| > >>>>>doing a
| > >>>>>web preview. Publisher converts everything to a gif file.
| > >>>>>
| > >>>>>I would like to invest in a new web site design program, but I want
to
| > >>>>>make
| > >>>>>sure that when I do layering like mention above I won't have the
same
| > >>>>>problem. Any recommendations on website design software that will
do
| > >>>>>what
| > >>>>>I
| > >>>>>want and is not too difficult to use?
| > >>>>
| > >>>>
| > >>>>
| > >>
| >
| >
 
D

DavidF

No, I would use a web font so that the text can be read. Google "web fonts"
and educate yourself a bit more about why its important to use web fonts.

Read my last post more carefully. Publisher doesn't limit your "creativity"
as much as the medium does. There are things you can do in print that will
not convert to html, regardless of what program you use. Using Edwardian
Script will be a problem in every program.

I would suggest that you step back and think about what goals you have for
your site. If you can clearly define the scope and goals for your site, then
you can decide what program would be the best choice. And before you get too
"creative" here is some more reference material you might read.
http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/
http://www.webdesignfromscratch.com/
Using Publisher for web sites:
http://msmvps.com/blogs/dbartosik/articles/80566.aspx

DavidF
 
K

Karin

Thanks for all of your inputs. You have allbe real helpful. I will do some
more research like David suggested.
 
T

TX2ME

I used to use Publisher 2003 for basic website design and had the same
things happening. Publisher is one of the easiest programs for web
site creation (if you are a microsoft user). However, be aware that if
you use it's automatic navigation bar tool it changes all navigation
into images. This makes it tough for Google to crawl your entire site.
so create your navigation system with some careful fore-thought.

My business is web design (www.flyingchangewebs.com), so I have
switched to Expression Web. It is an extremely powerful tool. However,
unless web design/development is your business, I wouldn't recommend
using it. Expression web has some funny quirks and a huge learning
curve and does require some knowledge of html.

Good Luck!
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top