Thanks, Bill...
I read about Lon via the link you referred me to. 'Twas nice to see another
old-timer out there...
Yes, I have noticed the speed issue with ACT 2006 and have also noticed
several features that they have removed. Fortunately, I'm good at workarounds
:-( but those are several strikes against ACT.
Interesting that you mentioned data corruption. I found that when I finally
imported my old ACT data into BCM for a test, the ~4K character limit on the
Outlook notes field was a real issue for me. BCM truncated many, many notes
in many records, leaving me with a text file that that challenged me to put
things together. It was not a workable solution, and my notes are very
important. ACT apparently does not have this limitation. That's a strike
against BCM.
I am a MS shop, and prefer to run MS products. That's why I was really
interested in BCM. But, I guess the final kicker is that, after so many years
of using ACT, there's not much new stuff to learn. With BCM, it's a total
re-tooling of how we do things. And, given our (my wife and me) ages, we
don't remember new things that well any more. So being able to work with ACT
by rote is extrememly helpful.
After all this is said, we will work with the ACT trial. If it becomes
unbearable, we'll try BCM again. But losing the complete notes is a big issue.
Thanks for all your input and feedback...