R
rt
I've asked this question before but accidentally deleted it.
We're using PS2003 SP2a, reporting hours of work done per day or per
week (enforced) with managed periods on.
Some PM's insist to update their schedules using fixed duration tasks.
That causes units to skyrocket - this phenomenon has been extensively
discussed here.
What I don't fully understand, however, is what happens on some tasks
like the following:
Fixed duration 125d (Dec. 11 - Jun. 1)
Non-effort driven
12 resources assigned to the task
Resources started time reporting at different times (no zeroes used on
day 1)
Not all resources have started reporting time on this assignment
Actual Work usually not equal to Work in a given period
So, lots of things that are not best practice...
When the PM accepts actuals on such assignments, Project puts all
Remaining Work per assignment on the next week, sometimes 2 or 3
weeks, at enormously high workloads, even though the fixed duration
hasn't expired (neither on the task, nor on the assignment).
I've looked at this issue from many different angles but I can't put
my finger on the logic behind it. I understand why Project sometimes
extends a fixed duration task. I also understand that Project may need
to redistrubute the task's work among the different assignments and
that this may cause high units. And I suspect that the way the actuals
are reported causes the assignments to become contoured.
What I don't understand is why Project doesn't use the full duration
to spread out the work - contoured or not, at high units or not. Can
anyone enlighten me? Please?
We're using PS2003 SP2a, reporting hours of work done per day or per
week (enforced) with managed periods on.
Some PM's insist to update their schedules using fixed duration tasks.
That causes units to skyrocket - this phenomenon has been extensively
discussed here.
What I don't fully understand, however, is what happens on some tasks
like the following:
Fixed duration 125d (Dec. 11 - Jun. 1)
Non-effort driven
12 resources assigned to the task
Resources started time reporting at different times (no zeroes used on
day 1)
Not all resources have started reporting time on this assignment
Actual Work usually not equal to Work in a given period
So, lots of things that are not best practice...
When the PM accepts actuals on such assignments, Project puts all
Remaining Work per assignment on the next week, sometimes 2 or 3
weeks, at enormously high workloads, even though the fixed duration
hasn't expired (neither on the task, nor on the assignment).
I've looked at this issue from many different angles but I can't put
my finger on the logic behind it. I understand why Project sometimes
extends a fixed duration task. I also understand that Project may need
to redistrubute the task's work among the different assignments and
that this may cause high units. And I suspect that the way the actuals
are reported causes the assignments to become contoured.
What I don't understand is why Project doesn't use the full duration
to spread out the work - contoured or not, at high units or not. Can
anyone enlighten me? Please?