Not everyone wants their applications "reaching out" to the web for simple usage issues. And not everyone is connected 24x7.
--
Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]
Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. All
unsolicited mail sent to my personal account will be deleted without
reading.
After furious head scratching, rprilop asked:
| On May 31, 2:01 am, boblarson <
[email protected]>
| wrote:
|| Just remember that Google has the benefits of their powerful servers
|| for doing this type of matching algorythm. I seriously doubt that
|| most pc's will have the same processing power and therein lies some
|| of the problem. It isn't necessarily that it can't be done, but can
|| it be done with the lowest level of hardware that Word is set to run
|| on. I doubt many people would be all that excited to have to go
|| purchase the latest equipment with 4 to 8 GB of RAM to just be able
|| to use Word without it taking forever for a spell check.
||
|| Just a thought...
||
|| --
|| Bob Larson
|| Access World Forums Administrator
||
|| Tutorials athttp://
www.btabdevelopment.com
||
|| __________________________________
||
||
||
|| "Richard" wrote:
||| When you can even come close to spelling a word.... WORD cant help.
||| But you type the same ridiculous guess of the word in Google search
||| and "wa-la" or in fact VOILA which is what you get when you put wa
||| la in Google, Word..... forget it.
||
||| Or if you type "barmitzva" Words got nothing, Google UHHH "Did you
||| mean:
||| bar mitzvah"
||
||| Come on, stop with all the petty enhancements that NO ONE cares
||| about and make it work for normal people.... that cant spell. -
||| Hide quoted text -
||
|| - Show quoted text -
|
| Well i understand but as more an more apps reach out to the web to do
| stuff, maybe thats a good case for it.
