M
MC
I just updated Office to 12.2.3 and there is almost no time lag in
loading Word now.
loading Word now.
Yes, Word 2008 (12.2.3) after the update loads up within anywhere from
about 10 seconds (after quitting Word, putting the Mac to sleep and
starting up again) to a blinding two seconds on my system.
Holy Batman, we've got a speed demon on our hands!
I'm on Mac OS X 10.6.2, 2 GB Core 2 Duo with 4 GB RAM.
Jeff
Fit your 'puter with an SSD for the System and Applications, and Word 2008
launches faster than you can hit the stop-watch![]()
Hi John,
Uh huh... but they do cost an arm and a leg. I can buy a new computer
for the price of refitting my MacBook with a 128GB SSD.
Jeff
Jeff said:Hi John,
Uh huh... but they do cost an arm and a leg. I can buy a new computer
for the price of refitting my MacBook with a 128GB SSD.
Jeff
You can get one version of the
go here: you can get a built in 128GB SSD to MacBook Air. Pretty cheap too.
http://store.apple.com/us/browse/home/shop_mac/family/macbook_air?mco=MTAyNTQz
Mjc
To me the Technology is just too new I wouldn't Trust it. Just like when
CD Technology first came out. You made more coasters than reliable CD's.
And beside the SSD's as Currently have a limited life. A Hard drive does
as well but if Treated right a HD has very long life. And with the SSD's
If you try to write items such as Music or Pictures takes a very long
time. from my understand if the technology.
I've had to replace one or two of my Cards in my Digital Camera because
they started acting funny. For computer use I want something I can
depend upon.
John McGhie said:There's another bit of good SSDs don't typically fail "all at once,
bang, you've lost it". They start throwing single-bit errors.
Correctible
errors. The system usually has years to detect these errors and warn you
that the drive is on the way out before it gets to the point where it
begins
to lose data.
SSDs are a good thing: but the current crop is "a good first attempt".
Watch this space...
CyberTaz said:Hi Clive!
I'm not sure these would be your wordsbut since you seem to be
uncharacteristically speechless...
Not being judgmental, but I truly believe that anyone with at least
semi-serious computing needs& not infatuated with fads&
techno-conversation pieces would agree with John's perspective on the Air...
Especially many of those who are already in possession of one ;-)
IMO, His comparison of the MB/MBP is not as well-founded. Knowing John, he's
probably comparing a stock MB to a blown-out 17" MBP, though ;-)
It also depends on which respective generations you chose to compare. I took
the plunge in favor of the 15" MBP nearly 2 years ago. My keys for the
decision at that time remain valid as of the current releases. The
difference in price was justified in my mind by the larger screen, backlit
keyboard& inclusion of a FireWire port& higher graphics performance.
Additionally, at that time MBs were limited to 2GB& offered slower
processors. A few less significant features factored in as well.
As for reliability, I've had zero problems. Performance has been flawless&
it has accepted every device I've connected to it -- physically or via
Bluetooth. And the weight difference -- that amount to probably 1/10 of the
weight of all the other needless junk most folks cram into their laptop
bags... And then complain about how heavy the *computer* is
Regards |:>)
Bob Jones
[MVP] Office:Mac
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.