D
dch3
(Please read the ENTIRE post)
I'm going to add some additional functionality to an existing database that
has jacked up table & field names. There are only a handful, but given my
time constraints I can't fix things now - like I should. From this point
forward, I'd like to use naming conventions that make sense. Here's what I'm
planning on doing...
1) My new objects will be in a separate MDB linked back to the existing
database. Ultimately, it will be a traditionally split database design.
2) Instead of linking my forms and reports DIRECTLY to the linked queries,
I'm going to create simple select queries that use expressions to convert the
jacked up field names to a common naming convention.
3) Once the queries are ready, the new forms and reports will be based on
them. Since the field names will technically be the same, all I'll have to do
is change the record source to reflect the change in table names.
In a sense, I'll be providing an alias of sorts for the jacked up names. The
temporary queries will server as an intermediate layer of sorts.
The total number of forms and reports in both databases will be VERY
minimal, so we're not discussing anything major.
Any ideas? Has anyone else tried this?
Note: I've been working with Access for nearly 10 years now and have
encountered a wide variety of situations (but have never had to try this) and
I'm fully aware of the cavet and pitfalls of trying to change object names
too deep into development.
I'm going to add some additional functionality to an existing database that
has jacked up table & field names. There are only a handful, but given my
time constraints I can't fix things now - like I should. From this point
forward, I'd like to use naming conventions that make sense. Here's what I'm
planning on doing...
1) My new objects will be in a separate MDB linked back to the existing
database. Ultimately, it will be a traditionally split database design.
2) Instead of linking my forms and reports DIRECTLY to the linked queries,
I'm going to create simple select queries that use expressions to convert the
jacked up field names to a common naming convention.
3) Once the queries are ready, the new forms and reports will be based on
them. Since the field names will technically be the same, all I'll have to do
is change the record source to reflect the change in table names.
In a sense, I'll be providing an alias of sorts for the jacked up names. The
temporary queries will server as an intermediate layer of sorts.
The total number of forms and reports in both databases will be VERY
minimal, so we're not discussing anything major.
Any ideas? Has anyone else tried this?
Note: I've been working with Access for nearly 10 years now and have
encountered a wide variety of situations (but have never had to try this) and
I'm fully aware of the cavet and pitfalls of trying to change object names
too deep into development.