R
Ralf
Dear All,
Currently I ask myself if the design of my database is wrong.
I have several tables with a lot of fields which use 'Value List' as a row
source type. Each of my row sources look like this: ';;1;">= 1 hours
arrival";2;"< 1 hours arrival";8;"Not applicable";9;"Unknown"'. Of course
each row source is different content wise.
Now, my customer got back to me and wants to build up his own queries which
involve those kind of row sources. Because he is not that familiar with
writing SQL so he uses the designer and realised that there were no tables
for all of those values I put into 'Value List's.
1. So, my initial question is, should the usage of 'Value List's be avoided?
2. But on the other hand, is it practical to have up to 40 additional
mini-tables with the maximum of 6 rows?
3. And what would you do if you're in my situation now to fulfil the
customer's wish?
Thank you,
Ralf
Currently I ask myself if the design of my database is wrong.
I have several tables with a lot of fields which use 'Value List' as a row
source type. Each of my row sources look like this: ';;1;">= 1 hours
arrival";2;"< 1 hours arrival";8;"Not applicable";9;"Unknown"'. Of course
each row source is different content wise.
Now, my customer got back to me and wants to build up his own queries which
involve those kind of row sources. Because he is not that familiar with
writing SQL so he uses the designer and realised that there were no tables
for all of those values I put into 'Value List's.
1. So, my initial question is, should the usage of 'Value List's be avoided?
2. But on the other hand, is it practical to have up to 40 additional
mini-tables with the maximum of 6 rows?
3. And what would you do if you're in my situation now to fulfil the
customer's wish?
Thank you,
Ralf