D
Deyan
Here is a thing I wonder why is done this way in the new XML file format. Why
does the tag names of the XML have such names? Tags like <w
> and <w:t> does
not have very clear meaning. Of course on a second thought you understand
that the meaning actually is pararaph and text, and still it is not very
obvious. I guess this may sound a little silly to you but, why did you guys
took the effort to do it this way, when a simple object serialization would
have done the same, even better job? There must be some reason.
does the tag names of the XML have such names? Tags like <w
> and <w:t> doesnot have very clear meaning. Of course on a second thought you understand
that the meaning actually is pararaph and text, and still it is not very
obvious. I guess this may sound a little silly to you but, why did you guys
took the effort to do it this way, when a simple object serialization would
have done the same, even better job? There must be some reason.