E
EggCell
_Can_anyone_help_save_this_working_man's_wallet?_
I have two sets of monthly expense figures, budgeted (A1) and actua
(B1). In C1 I have =IF(A1=0,0,B1/A1) to calculate how much in % th
actual is over or under the budget without having a #DIV/0! if th
budgeted is zero.
But if both A1 and B1 =0, C1 returns 0% instead of the correct 100% (o
budget). If A1=0 and B1=n (e.g. 50), C1 would still be 0%. The infinit
nature of zero makes analyzing the budget not meaningful.
Even if we convert A1 to very close to zero (eg. .0001), C1 would b
nonsensically high. We need to put a limiter in the function, o
sacrifice that zero somehow to reach a balance between budget accurac
and the bigger picture. I'd hate to take us back to math theory, bu
are there any ideas for a better C1 formula
I have two sets of monthly expense figures, budgeted (A1) and actua
(B1). In C1 I have =IF(A1=0,0,B1/A1) to calculate how much in % th
actual is over or under the budget without having a #DIV/0! if th
budgeted is zero.
But if both A1 and B1 =0, C1 returns 0% instead of the correct 100% (o
budget). If A1=0 and B1=n (e.g. 50), C1 would still be 0%. The infinit
nature of zero makes analyzing the budget not meaningful.
Even if we convert A1 to very close to zero (eg. .0001), C1 would b
nonsensically high. We need to put a limiter in the function, o
sacrifice that zero somehow to reach a balance between budget accurac
and the bigger picture. I'd hate to take us back to math theory, bu
are there any ideas for a better C1 formula