2003 admin install + sp1 = "not entered a valid product key"

M

Mark Curtin

That's kind of what I was thinking- that I had to rebuild the AIP. The reason for the .mst is for
customizing the rest of the install, I was just noting that the PID was contained in the .mst as
well so maybe that's why I have been able to deploy via GPO without issue even if the AIP was
missing the PID for some reason.

I'm sure I had to specify the PID when I built the AIP initially, however, but it's been quite a
while...
 
M

Mark Curtin

That's kind of what I was thinking- that I had to rebuild the AIP. The reason for the .mst is for
customizing the rest of the install, I was just noting that the PID was contained in the .mst as
well so maybe that's why I have been able to deploy via GPO without issue even if the AIP was
missing the PID for some reason.

I'm sure I had to specify the PID when I built the AIP initially, however, but it's been quite a
while...
 
M

Mark Curtin

That's kind of what I was thinking- that I had to rebuild the AIP. The reason for the .mst is for
customizing the rest of the install, I was just noting that the PID was contained in the .mst as
well so maybe that's why I have been able to deploy via GPO without issue even if the AIP was
missing the PID for some reason.

I'm sure I had to specify the PID when I built the AIP initially, however, but it's been quite a
while...
 
M

Mark Curtin

That's kind of what I was thinking- that I had to rebuild the AIP. The reason for the .mst is for
customizing the rest of the install, I was just noting that the PID was contained in the .mst as
well so maybe that's why I have been able to deploy via GPO without issue even if the AIP was
missing the PID for some reason.

I'm sure I had to specify the PID when I built the AIP initially, however, but it's been quite a
while...
 
M

Mark Curtin

That's kind of what I was thinking- that I had to rebuild the AIP. The reason for the .mst is for
customizing the rest of the install, I was just noting that the PID was contained in the .mst as
well so maybe that's why I have been able to deploy via GPO without issue even if the AIP was
missing the PID for some reason.

I'm sure I had to specify the PID when I built the AIP initially, however, but it's been quite a
while...
 
M

Mark Curtin

That's kind of what I was thinking- that I had to rebuild the AIP. The reason for the .mst is for
customizing the rest of the install, I was just noting that the PID was contained in the .mst as
well so maybe that's why I have been able to deploy via GPO without issue even if the AIP was
missing the PID for some reason.

I'm sure I had to specify the PID when I built the AIP initially, however, but it's been quite a
while...
 
M

Mark Curtin

That's kind of what I was thinking- that I had to rebuild the AIP. The reason for the .mst is for
customizing the rest of the install, I was just noting that the PID was contained in the .mst as
well so maybe that's why I have been able to deploy via GPO without issue even if the AIP was
missing the PID for some reason.

I'm sure I had to specify the PID when I built the AIP initially, however, but it's been quite a
while...
 
M

Mark Curtin

That's kind of what I was thinking- that I had to rebuild the AIP. The reason for the .mst is for
customizing the rest of the install, I was just noting that the PID was contained in the .mst as
well so maybe that's why I have been able to deploy via GPO without issue even if the AIP was
missing the PID for some reason.

I'm sure I had to specify the PID when I built the AIP initially, however, but it's been quite a
while...
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top