G
Greg Maxey
Peter,
Yes, I forgot to mention that I did see your HOWEVER. I also overlooked
suggesting that you should also reflect on goals and objectives statement
number 5.
5. STOP SHOUTING in the newsgroup.
I think the only reason you wasted more typing is because like in most other
cases even when wrong you continue with your arguments.
"Your method" up cleaning up text. Please Peter. As Ms. Barnhill has
pointed out, that method is well documented and published on her website and
mine. What she didn't mention was that it has been so published long before
you crawled out from under your rock and joined this newsgroup.
Your beat Luke. Stay down.
--
Greg Maxey
See my web site http://gregmaxey.mvps.org
for an eclectic collection of Word Tips.
"It is not the critic who counts, not the man who points out how the strong
man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The
credit belongs to the man in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and
sweat and blood, who strives valiantly...who knows the great enthusiasms,
the great devotions, who spends himself in a worthy cause, who at the best
knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if
he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never
be with those cold and timid souls who have never known neither victory nor
defeat." - TR
Once again, you failed to read my instructions. The part that began
with the capitalized word
HOWEVER.
If you'll read that caveat, you'll find that you've just wasted an
awful lot of typing.
The ONLY reason I'm wasting typing by replying to you is in case
someone comes across your message and tries applying your perversion
of my method for solving the problem of cleaning up line-paragraphed
text _where all the paragraphed lines do NOT come in groups of exactly
two_. (Or whatever your kludge ended up fixing.)
Yes, I forgot to mention that I did see your HOWEVER. I also overlooked
suggesting that you should also reflect on goals and objectives statement
number 5.
5. STOP SHOUTING in the newsgroup.
I think the only reason you wasted more typing is because like in most other
cases even when wrong you continue with your arguments.
"Your method" up cleaning up text. Please Peter. As Ms. Barnhill has
pointed out, that method is well documented and published on her website and
mine. What she didn't mention was that it has been so published long before
you crawled out from under your rock and joined this newsgroup.
Your beat Luke. Stay down.
--
Greg Maxey
See my web site http://gregmaxey.mvps.org
for an eclectic collection of Word Tips.
"It is not the critic who counts, not the man who points out how the strong
man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The
credit belongs to the man in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and
sweat and blood, who strives valiantly...who knows the great enthusiasms,
the great devotions, who spends himself in a worthy cause, who at the best
knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if
he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never
be with those cold and timid souls who have never known neither victory nor
defeat." - TR
Once again, you failed to read my instructions. The part that began
with the capitalized word
HOWEVER.
If you'll read that caveat, you'll find that you've just wasted an
awful lot of typing.
The ONLY reason I'm wasting typing by replying to you is in case
someone comes across your message and tries applying your perversion
of my method for solving the problem of cleaning up line-paragraphed
text _where all the paragraphed lines do NOT come in groups of exactly
two_. (Or whatever your kludge ended up fixing.)