Hi Norm:
OK, the magic incantation you are missing is "Unicode"
Essentially what
we are talking about is the "street map" that tells the computer where to
find the characters.
Palatino was standard on Macs up to OS 10.3.9, when Apple took it out.
The old version is a code-page font that will give you problems if you use
it in modern applications.
In the new Unicode/OpenType standard, the characters are all assigned
numbers in a long continuous string. That string contains potentially
1,114,111 characters, which should be enough for most folks.
The old way of doing it was to assign "code pages" which each contain 256
characters. The application had to specify font, code page, and character
number to get something on the screen.
The two methods are not compatible, which is why your Palatino looks a bit
odd in Word. Being a modern Unicode application, Word looks in your copy of
Palatino for the character. If it can't find it, it pulls in the character
from the most similar font it has that does contain the character. So you
are getting some characters from different fonts. This issue is endemic in
the old code page system. Unless you know the font well, you can't be sure
which code page certain characters are in (each font contains multiple code
pages). Sadly: the code page for a particular character (glyph) can vary
between the Mac and PC versions of the font. So if you send a document to
Windows, they may see the wrong characters. The other problem is that some
of these fonts are "Type 1" PostScript. Unless they have a real PostScript
printer, the other user may not be able to print the characters at all.
These problems are not as bad as I make them sound, but they're frequent
enough to be annoying.
The cure to all of this is to switch in a Unicode version of the Palatino
font.
If you wanted to do the job properly, you would go buy Adobe's version,
which is an entire font pack and contains the widest range of Unicode values
(and hence: characters). It is very unlikely that any application will have
to go looking for a character it can't find, if you are using the Adobe
version.
However, if funding is a consideration, there are ways to solve this
Both Apple and Microsoft provide a "free" version of Palatino Linotype
Unicode.
The Apple version is in iWork. It appears to be a TrueType CodePage version
from 2006.
The Microsoft version is a beautiful Unicode flavour you will find in
Windows 2000 and later (and for free download on the Internet if you Google
around for it...)
If you happen to be passing a Windows computer with your USB key in your
pocket {grin} distract the user for a moment and hop into the
C:/Windows/Fonts folder. The files you are looking for are "pala.ttf",
palab.ttf, palai.ttf, palabi.ttf.
Grab the one from Windows Vista if you get a chance, it's a more recent
version. Just copy those files into your Fonts folder on the Mac ‹ they'll
work
Of course, if you already have Windows on your Mac, simply copy those files
out of its Fonts folder into the Mac's Font folder
(BTW: That's
"legal", in that you already own the font, so you can use it on your Mac...)
Cheers
OP back. I enjoyed and learned lots from the last thread so I'm back
with a couple of questions.
I've been trying out Book Antiqua and Constantia. However, I still
prefer Palatino. I like Book Antiqua but the spacing seems different
especially in some lists. And I personally didn't like the
digits/numerals in Constantia.
I assume I'm testing correctly ..... I just have several MS Word docs
and I switch from one font to another.
Question:
Looking at Font Book info, most if not all say "True Type". If I
purchase a Palatino, do I look for a certain type of Palatino?
I'd just keep using Palatino that is on my Mac. Not sure the source of
any of the fonts. But lately in some Word and Excel programs, when I
bold the Palatino some letters look very strange. Not sure what is going
on.
I think that was one of the primary reasons I first asked the question
about whether to stay with Palatino or not. That and the fact that I'm
switching from Office v.X to Office 2008 and also trying out Pages 09 as
an alternative to Office 2008.
Thanks for any additional education/recommendations.
--
Don't wait for your answer, click here:
http://www.word.mvps.org/
Please reply in the group. Please do NOT email me unless I ask you to.
John McGhie, Microsoft MVP, Word and Word:Mac
Sydney, Australia. mailto:
[email protected]