Kerry, the 27" is awesome?
Yes, I'd say the consensus that I noticed at apple.com to my question
was that the 27" was awesome but a number of people did say for what I
do which involves no gaming or heavy duty graphics intensive apps the
21.5 is more suitable. The one thing I find interesting in your note
is the text size. One person said that I think per square inch on the
27" there's 120 pixels and the 23" there's 98 pixels. My text size is
great but he mentioned and I think I saw this elsewhere is some find
the text a little too small on the 27". Since so much of what I do is
writing, this is something to really consider. Again, its something I
did not pick up when I was looking at these two units side by side but
would be important to me. I think the fellow said the 21.5 is 109
pixels per square inch so the text is larger.
The one thing that is delaying any buying decision these
considerations a long with I really think for the couple hundred extra
I'd want the i7/5 processor. Although I don't need that horspower now,
I always find eventually these things get used with time. That's not
available on the 21.5" but I suspect by next summer they'll release
one that has the processor. I just keep reading all these reviews and
it does seem to pack a performance hit which I'd like. So I'd like a
machine with that and 8 gigs of memory. Your point around text size is
very important. I think I'll go down to the Apple Store and bring up a
word processor in each and just write and see how it strikes me. When
I was comparing the two this is something I never thought of doing. I
did a number of other things like launching apps to see what
performance was like, positioning things on the screen to see how that
extra real estate would benefit me etc.
In terms of your KM question, Diane is best to answer that but I would
think it would just be a macro that invokes the reply command and then
a windows move command and then way you'd go.