W
Wally S
Hi Eric,
What you say sounds a lot more complex than necessary, at least in my case.
I am not a professional designer. My site is a news site for a religious
organization, and is updated frequently (although I recently took a
two-month vacation). I keep my design extremely simple, and my readers are
satisfied with the results I get using FP. I guess that's the real
criterion.
Some of the pros on the newsgroup have looked at my site and have found no
problems with the coding, so I don't see where I would get any benefit from
what you suggest. To me, it would make more sense to let FP do the hard work
and then tweak it rather than to invent the wheel twice.
Of course, what is suitable for me may not be suitable in all cases, and
maybe what you say would be applicable for the design of a complex site, but
I don't know whether the professional designers in the newsgroup would agree
with that.
Wally S
www.dipika.org
What you say sounds a lot more complex than necessary, at least in my case.
I am not a professional designer. My site is a news site for a religious
organization, and is updated frequently (although I recently took a
two-month vacation). I keep my design extremely simple, and my readers are
satisfied with the results I get using FP. I guess that's the real
criterion.
Some of the pros on the newsgroup have looked at my site and have found no
problems with the coding, so I don't see where I would get any benefit from
what you suggest. To me, it would make more sense to let FP do the hard work
and then tweak it rather than to invent the wheel twice.
Of course, what is suitable for me may not be suitable in all cases, and
maybe what you say would be applicable for the design of a complex site, but
I don't know whether the professional designers in the newsgroup would agree
with that.
Wally S
www.dipika.org