Thanks for the bunch of ideas, Jonathan!
Jonathan <jonathan7zerozero7(use numbers) at yahew dot usual
domain> shared these words of wisdom:
If you are looking ahead at use of OneNote2007 then I think the
best "book" would be reading this forum (save the juicy parts in
OneNote --- that's what I do.)
That's what I meanwhile did too with several postings ;-)
Learning by doing <d>
BTW: very easy from Outlook Express (my newsreader and mail-client):
Marking the posting in the list, Edit | Copy, then pasting into ON.
*and* the blogs from the
following people:
Chris Prately
Owen Bauer
Dan Escapa
Already in my ON said:
David Rasmussen
(fiorst name?) Strong, the UK product manager for Outlook
and, perhaps, the other blogs they reference.
Yes, it's *David*
Added
http://blogs.gotdotnet.com/david_rasmussen/default.aspx
to my list.
[...]
I did not have more than a couple of hours experience with
ON2003 but this 2007 version seems like what I thought 2003
would be like. And there are still things missing in 2007.
Same estimation on my side.
I read all this stuff on the forum and love the broad reach of
the questions. the forum is a forward-looking view. The books,
however, are all likely to be written such a long time ago.
Yes, many things are different now.
Still I hope to get some basic ideas on what I call the "philosophy".
For me it always is most important to understand what it's about, not
just "click here, then there .."
[...]
I want to know how to change my way of working and the
books spend so much time on the interface and commands.
Absolutely the same on my side.
The German book I bought (online, not in a bookstore) was just that.
Pretty useless, money thrown out of the window [grrrh].
Kathy Jacobs has a web site for her work in PowerPoint and
OneNote.
Also put in my ON notebook the other day said:
Good luck. Maybe YOU will write the book that needs to be
written.
Your idea honours me. But this will not happen.
Quite a number of books that I should have written ...
And I'm sure it will take quite some time until I can just work with
ON.
Thanks again for sharing your thoughts and for valuable suggestions
Rainald