Free/Busy server not kept as a public folder

E

Eric Kwang

Hi,

My company, for sake of argument, ABC company, uses the following format
to identify our Exchange server: abc-exchange.abc.com. That, according my
IT guy, is also my Free/Busy Server, as it is not kept as a public folder
on our network. To make matters worse, adding the /public or /public/
notation to the end of our exchange server name only cases Entourage to
crash. And it gets worse--we use SSL for OWA as well. Does all this mean
I'll never be able to receive (view) or publish free/busy status for
myself or others when I schedule an even with Entourage?

Eric
 
C

Corentin Cras-Méneur [MVP]

Hi Eric,
My company, for sake of argument, ABC company, uses the following format
to identify our Exchange server: abc-exchange.abc.com. That, according my
IT guy, is also my Free/Busy Server, as it is not kept as a public folder
on our network. To make matters worse, adding the /public or /public/
notation to the end of our exchange server name only cases Entourage to
crash. And it gets worse--we use SSL for OWA as well. Does all this mean
I'll never be able to receive (view) or publish free/busy status for
myself or others when I schedule an even with Entourage?

If you use SSL for OWA, then you have to set up the free-busy server to
use SSL as well (it usually is the same server). You have to select the
"use SSL" check box for the free/busy server.
Does itwork if you do that???



Corentin
 
E

Eric Kwang

Hello,

Thanks for the reply---yes, I have selected the use SSL checkbox. Still
get the message that the scheduling data cannot be located.

Eric
 
E

Eric Kwang

Hi Dianne,

Yes to both. I think it might just be one of those issues that will never
be resolved :eek:(

Eric
 
D

David Blaymires

I don't use exchange so I'm woefully ignorant of anything about exchange.
Sorry.

Hi Diane,

The following is not a criticism of you or any of the other MVPs - I think
you do a great (unpaid) job, and show a level of dedication and community
spirit that is sadly lacking in many other areas.

However, I think that whoever is the coordinator of the newsgroups needs to
get at least one, if not more, Exchange qualified people onto this list, so
that there IS someone who can answer/address the more technical problems
that are associated with using Entourage against an Exchange server. It is
a HUGELY technical beast, and there needs to be one or more MVPs who
understand this, and Active Directory, and the myriad of other things that
impact on the use of Entourage in a Windows world.

If I've missed the fact that there is a technically qualified MVP who hangs
out here, this is not intended as a slight (note the way that I started this
email). I've just missed it, and perhaps they weren't around when we were
having our issues just after the release of Entourage X 10.1.4, and the
gnarly bits that we have had since.
 
E

Eric Kwang

Its funny, at the MS website for support, they say that if an end-user
needs more help, they ought to see their Exchange administrator; I did and
he can't help me at all--he just says that everythings is done from our
exchange server and that he has no clue what I'm talking about when I ask
him exactly where the free/busy server is located. Both of the support
guys just tell me to get a PC and dump my Mac.

Eric
 
P

Paul Berkowitz

Hi Diane,

The following is not a criticism of you or any of the other MVPs - I think
you do a great (unpaid) job, and show a level of dedication and community
spirit that is sadly lacking in many other areas.

However, I think that whoever is the coordinator of the newsgroups needs to
get at least one, if not more, Exchange qualified people onto this list, so
that there IS someone who can answer/address the more technical problems
that are associated with using Entourage against an Exchange server. It is
a HUGELY technical beast, and there needs to be one or more MVPs who
understand this, and Active Directory, and the myriad of other things that
impact on the use of Entourage in a Windows world.

You seem to have a bit of a misunderstanding as to who and what MVPs are,
although you do seem to realize we don't work for Microsoft. We're just
users who came here for help ourselves, and stayed on to help others as best
we can. Microsoft has noticed and recognized some of us with the MVP title,
which may help a bit in keeping us around! As it happens - as Diane says -
none of us have Exchange so none of us is up on this. By definition, to be
on Exchange you have to work for a large - or substantial, anyway - company.
That does not happen to be a requirement for MVP-hood. (Actually one of us
is on Exchange, but it's 5.5 on Windows so doesn't help with Entourage
integration.) We all would be only too overjoyed if someone participating in
these newsgroups were an Exchange expert - said person would undoubtedly get
our recommendation for MVP consideration by MS pretty quickly!

The "coordinator of the newsgroups" - namely Microsoft Corporation - didn't
bring any of us here. We all came here just like you did - looking for help
from other users. MS just provide the access (the newsgroups on their news
server) and alert people on their websites to the newsgroups. The idea is
that most of the time things will just work out - there are enough people
around who like to help. sometimes - like now - it doesn't work out so well.
MS does also provide paid support, you know. (Some very large corporations
even have arrangements with MS - I don't know how developed that may be on
the Mac side.) So if you're really stuck and need individual help, you could
phone Microsoft for paid, professional support. Someone there will follow
things through with you. I think it's pretty expensive, but I don't recall
that Microsoft ever promised you free professional support, did they?
If I've missed the fact that there is a technically qualified MVP who hangs
out here, this is not intended as a slight (note the way that I started this
email). I've just missed it, and perhaps they weren't around when we were
having our issues just after the release of Entourage X 10.1.4, and the
gnarly bits that we have had since.

A few people with Exchange expertise have dropped in here from time to time.
If you dig far enough back in the news group posts you may well find the
answer to your specific questions. You could also try the Exchange and
Outlook Windows MS newsgroups - some Exchange specialists and MVPs there
must have some experience with Entourage users on their servers.


--
Paul Berkowitz
MVP Entourage
Entourage FAQ Page: http://www.entourage.mvps.org/toc.html

Please "Reply To Newsgroup" to reply to this message. Emails will be
ignored.

PLEASE always state which version of Entourage you are using - 2001 or X.
It's often impossible to answer your questions otherwise.
 
D

Diane Ross

The following is not a criticism of you or any of the other MVPs - I think
you do a great (unpaid) job, and show a level of dedication and community
spirit that is sadly lacking in many other areas.

Thanks! We do our best to help. I find that most Mac users are more than
willing to help if they can. Just finding someone that knows your particular
situation is the hard part.
However, I think that whoever is the coordinator of the newsgroups needs to
get at least one, if not more, Exchange qualified people onto this list, so
that there IS someone who can answer/address the more technical problems
that are associated with using Entourage against an Exchange server. It is
a HUGELY technical beast, and there needs to be one or more MVPs who
understand this, and Active Directory, and the myriad of other things that
impact on the use of Entourage in a Windows world.

For a while several of the Entourage developers answered questions on this
list about exchange. This was on their own time too.

FWIW, this news list is not an official MS support forum. It is only hosted
by MS.
If I've missed the fact that there is a technically qualified MVP who hangs
out here, this is not intended as a slight (note the way that I started this
email). I've just missed it, and perhaps they weren't around when we were
having our issues just after the release of Entourage X 10.1.4, and the
gnarly bits that we have had since.

MVPs also have jobs and other issues that demand their time. I do know that
some MVPs do have experience, but just don't have time to monitor this list
on a daily basis.

The Entourage Talk list is totally different from this list. There are many
users there with broad skills and understanding of Entourage. It's a
community of users. Many started out on the Claris Emailer list and moved on
to OE then Entourage. It's not as busy as the newsgroup and really a good
list overall. I suggest asking there for help.

List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
 
C

Corentin Cras-Méneur [MVP]

Eric Kwang said:
Hi Diane,

I will do that. One more thing: I'm thinking of typing in the URL that we
use to access OWA. Which would be:

https://abc-exchange.abc.com

or, the web address which shows up once I've logged in online for OWA:

https://abc-exchange.abc.com/exchange/

Any thoughts for those as being the addie for my Free/Busy server in my
settings?

No, you don't enter the http:// in the free/busy server address at all.
In this specifica case, for both options you offer it would be just:
abc-exchange.abc.com/public


If you previously added the http:// it might explain why you couldn't
connect.

Corentin
 
C

Corentin Cras-Méneur [MVP]

Paul Berkowitz said:
As it happens - as Diane says -
none of us have Exchange so none of us is up on this. By definition, to be
on Exchange you have to work for a large - or substantial, anyway - company.
That does not happen to be a requirement for MVP-hood. (Actually one of us
is on Exchange, but it's 5.5 on Windows so doesn't help with Entourage
integration.)

Well, I know at least one of us working for a large institution that
uses Exchange 2000 and who uses it on his Mac.... ;-))

Unfortunately, I believe the problem goes is deeper than that.

- Using Exchange doesn't automatically make you an expert in solving all
the problems that may arise on different configurations.

- Using Exchange doesn't mean we can administrate the server, or get to
ask all possible questions to the administrator (eg: it took me several
months to get LDAP to work, simply because I never scould have the
parameters I needed) to try and understand what goes wrong or find
workarounds.

- Exchange comes with many possible different configurations and options
enabled.

- As Paul pointed out, we are not MS employees. As far as I'm concerned,
I come on the newsgroups on my free time (and I really don't have a lot
of free time considering how much work I have these days :-\) and I then
try to catch up following-up on previous posts and answering some new
ones.
I certainly would not consider myself an expert as far as Entourage
is concerned (it's not even my main e-mail client), but I have played
around with many network/internet related tools so I try to give a hand
with Exchange, POP and SMTP and NNTP problems (I usually skip the other
posts since I don't consider myself qualified at all). Actually, before
Exchange support was implemented, I hardly ever came around this group
to post (since then, and according to Google, I posted around 200 times
in the group, I'm getting better ;-))) ).
So please excuse the fact that I sometimes take a long time answering
back. My work comes first, then I get the the various MS:Mac newsgroups
and I do my best to help out :-\

- Oh yeah, English is not even my first language so of course, I'd be
naturally more enclined to answer the posts in the French newsgroups
(much easier for me) before I come in the US groups and do my best
answer posts without making to many mistakes or write sentences that
don't actually mean what I wanted to express...



Corentin
 
E

Eric Kwang

Hi Corentin,

Sadly, a couple of things have transpired since you have been helping with
my thread. First, with regard to the issue you pointed out, no, hadn't
appended the https or http before my abc-exchange.abc.com address when I
was having problems. I did, however, start having problems with my IMAP
account since we made (what I believe are some changes to our Exchange
server in terms of taking out of our company colo facility and bringing it
in-house), which prompted me to empty the cache in its entirety of my work
exchange (imap) account since I could no longer send email via the smtp
server address and port configuration given to me by my head IT guy (which
would have been to use abc-exchange.abc.com and port overide of port 25 to
port 587 when not connected to the network physically). So, recreated the
account at work and Entourage discovered everything automatically except
for my companies Free/Busy server. Now, I can no longer receive my work
email (even via IMAP). Depended on my level of frustration, I might end-up
paying the $199 for paid professional help with my Entourage problems and
share my findings with the group (should I go the paid route).

Thanks to you, Diane and everybody else on this list for offering assistance!

Eric
 
C

Corentin Cras-Méneur [MVP]

Eric Kwang said:
Hi Corentin,

Hi Eric,
Sadly, a couple of things have transpired since you have been helping with
my thread. First, with regard to the issue you pointed out, no, hadn't
appended the https or http before my abc-exchange.abc.com address when I
was having problems.

I see :-\
I did, however, start having problems with my IMAP
account since we made (what I believe are some changes to our Exchange
server in terms of taking out of our company colo facility and bringing it
in-house), which prompted me to empty the cache in its entirety of my work
exchange (imap) account since I could no longer send email via the smtp
server address and port configuration given to me by my head IT guy (which
would have been to use abc-exchange.abc.com and port overide of port 25 to
port 587 when not connected to the network physically).

Yeah, that's the kind of thing you cannot guess, you need to know what
port to use.
I had SMTP problems myself and ended up using my own mac as my SMTP
server through enabling PostFix.
So, recreated the
account at work and Entourage discovered everything automatically except
for my companies Free/Busy server. Now, I can no longer receive my work
email (even via IMAP).

What about if you re-set the account manually the way it was before ???
Depended on my level of frustration, I might end-up
paying the $199 for paid professional help with my Entourage problems and
share my findings with the group (should I go the paid route).

It is also possible that the OWA server uses a non standard type of
address that Entourage does not support :-\ or a diffrent port :-|

I really hope you'll manage to get this to work. I really do understand
how frustrating this all could be.
Thanks to you, Diane and everybody else on this list for offering assistance!

Well, you're very welcome. I just wish you could get it all fixed :-<


Corentin
 
D

Diane Ross

Depended on my level of frustration, I might end-up
paying the $199 for paid professional help with my Entourage problems and
share my findings with the group (should I go the paid route).

One last thing to try. Create a new User in System Preferences. Open
Entourage and enter the account info there. If it works then you will know
there is some corruption in your User preferences.
Thanks to you, Diane and everybody else on this list for offering assistance!

You're welcome. Just wish I had more help to offer.
 
D

David Blaymires

Thanks! We do our best to help. I find that most Mac users are more than
willing to help if they can. Just finding someone that knows your particular
situation is the hard part.


For a while several of the Entourage developers answered questions on this
list about exchange. This was on their own time too.

FWIW, this news list is not an official MS support forum. It is only hosted
by MS.


MVPs also have jobs and other issues that demand their time. I do know that
some MVPs do have experience, but just don't have time to monitor this list
on a daily basis.

The Entourage Talk list is totally different from this list. There are many
users there with broad skills and understanding of Entourage. It's a
community of users. Many started out on the Claris Emailer list and moved on
to OE then Entourage. It's not as busy as the newsgroup and really a good
list overall. I suggest asking there for help.

List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
To Paul, Diane and Corentin <bonjour!>,

Thanks for clarifying some things about the News Groups. I'm really glad
you didn't see what I was saying as criticism of MVPs. And I appreciate the
time you took to craft your replies.

One point from Paul's post contains an assumption that my experience tells
me is not correct - you do not have to be a "substantial" company to run
Exchange. In fact MSFT have a specific product called Small Business Server
that includes Exchange that is designed to get SMEs into a 2000/3 Server and
Exchange. We recommend it to many of our clients. Its great for anyone who
has 10 or more employees, but even 10 is not necessarily the lower limit. We
only have 9 employees at present and we have used Exchange since we had only
5 people. Its had a huge benefit for us.

However, that was not the point of my post. Can I say this to close this
off - If I go to the Remote Desktop Client news group, or to the Exchange
2000 news group, I will find contributors there whose names are suffixed
with [MSFT]. My experience of these news groups is that anyone with those
initials works for Microsoft. They are specialists in the field, are
generally part of the technical groups attached to the product, and are able
to make a contribution that is often (though not always) above the level of
many MVPs. After all, think of the resources they have at their disposal.

In the Remote Desktop Client newsgroup, the contributors are all members of
the MBU team who worked on the RDC. I presume they are contributing because
of the complexity of the product, and the relative lack of skill for anyone
who is outside the MBU in this product.

I'd dare to suggest that the same conditions exist with Entourage X 10.1.4
Exchange Edition - almost no-one outside of Microsoft has any experience of
the product and the gnarly bits that need to be sorted out. So why are the
people who helped get this product to market and sorted out the gnarly bits,
not present here on this news group?

I have asked questions of MSCE types, and they raise their eyebrows, shrug
their shoulders and say "must be a Mac problem...". So, I've tried the paid
route. And here in sunny Australia, the attitude I get from Evangelists at
Microsoft Australia is "we're the Windows company...", with the implication
of we're not interested in your Mac problem. And guess what? They're NOT
interested!

You can imagine how encouraging that is when we are software developers who
integrate our software with many MS products on Mac and Windows, we
recommend their server products because they support cross-platform access
(our software is totally cross platform), and we communicate with all their
email clients on both platforms.

Anyway, I digress perhaps. But I hope you see my point. I think you are
under-resourced. I know we feel that we can not get support for the
problems we have had, and have had to slash and burn our way to solutions
which have really been workarounds. There are still issues with this
product, and no-one at the MBU is communicating back to us (the users in the
news group).

Anyway, keep up the good work. I REALLY mean that. :)
 
D

Dave Cortright

One point from Paul's post contains an assumption that my experience tells
me is not correct - you do not have to be a "substantial" company to run
Exchange. In fact MSFT have a specific product called Small Business Server
that includes Exchange that is designed to get SMEs into a 2000/3 Server and
Exchange. We recommend it to many of our clients. Its great for anyone who
has 10 or more employees, but even 10 is not necessarily the lower limit. We
only have 9 employees at present and we have used Exchange since we had only
5 people. Its had a huge benefit for us.

No doubt many small businesses use Exchange, but it's extremely likely that
such businesses are PC only. In my experience few businesses this small will
have heterogeneous platforms, and if they do they will likely have a Mac
bent and won't be using Exchange. Hence, it vastly more likely that people
wanting to connect to Exchange server are the lonely islands of Mac users in
the vast sea of PCs at a large company.
 
D

Dave Cortright

Anyway, I digress perhaps. But I hope you see my point. I think you are
under-resourced. I know we feel that we can not get support for the
problems we have had, and have had to slash and burn our way to solutions
which have really been workarounds. There are still issues with this
product, and no-one at the MBU is communicating back to us (the users in the
news group).

I think the MVPs have done a great job with the Exchange content on their
web site, and I know for a fact that this content was developed with the
close help of Entourage team members.

http://www.entourage.mvps.org/faq/exchange_server.html

The problem with troubleshooting Exchange is that the issues are very
dependent on server configuration and network topology and it is difficult
if not impossible for others to attempt to reproduce the exact conditions.
And unfortunately even if you discover the problem (e.g. SMTP is turned
off), it's not always fixable since some changes require a server reconfig.

Also keep in mind that this was a v1 release of Exchange functionality. I'm
sure you can expect improvements in future versions of Entourage. And if it
doesn't work for you now, there are a plethora of other options available to
you including Outlook 2001 in Classic, Outlook Web Access, Windows Outlook
running in Virtual PC, and Windows Outlook running in RDC.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top