Inline please...
Peter Foldes said:
Sorry I left this out for you.
She did point out to the OP that what he did by posting his email ady will
get him a ton of spam. I think she helped him and other reading this post
to not to do this. Did >you think or realize this before you posted your
brilliant answer.
Yes, that is good she told him about his e-mail address and the risk of
spam. Good Miss PT!
But, if you are not totally blind you can see that in "almost every" answer
she gives to an OP, with whom she is not so "personally" familiar with, she
is to at least some degree, arrogant, abusive and complain about grammar to
the point of being pedantic and refuses to provide the answer even if she
knows it. Tell me...why not give the answer and also letting them know they
did something wrong with their way to make a post, just like others do? I
know some of the posts from so called "newbie's" are very hard to
understand,
but it is not hard to either move along, or telling them nicely to re-post
again with a better explanation.
Tell me also why she can make a OT post but use to complain when others do?
Don't get me wrong...I do not see anything wrong with OT post and would do
one my self but I would never attack anyone else who does it, or because
their lack of knowledge and experience makes them to post in the wrong NG.
Should we not treat others the way we also want to be treated?
I have seen you, Peter, defending her in other groups and to one point I can
agree that she can provide good answers but it's rare, and for the
records...I wanted to give her an objective assessment so I did put Miss
Perspicacia Tick in Google and thought I could see her being professional in
her role as a volunteer to Usenet but to my disappointment she appeared to
be just as nasty as others said she was.
Also at least she helped with the above which is more than I can say for
you
Yes, at least she helped with that, so I didn't have to and I also pointed
out to the OP that Office is not my thing.
Gunilla.
