Hmmm,
Having missed the development of this thread while travelling home I'm
simply amazed at the size and diversity of it. On the theme of KISS and
returning to the original request made by the OP what is wrong with the
original suggestion posted by myself?
I'm sure this now invites me to be shot down in flames but in defence of
that solution it variously:-
Provides an answer the OP recognised as solving the problem.
Was intuative in what it was doing so probably helped in his understanding.
Clearly wasn't elegant but I don't understand what the OP meant by this
except the lack of elegance was made in a comparison to a solution that
didn't work and was error prone.
Will not produce errors in the event of empty or cells not containing the
search string.
Doesn't give rise to the seemingly complicated issues of using FIND/FINDNEXT
which even MVP's seem to find difficult to agree on.
Is only 7 lines long (I agree it should be a couple more if variables had
been correctly dimensioned)
Executes as fast as any other offered solution (This test was limited to
searching ~ 5000 cells and sending the results to the immediate window.
Hasn't sent the OP to bed with a headache
So for the education of myself why does KISS not apply?
Regards,
Mike