Earle Horton wrote:
Earle Horton wrote:
Earle Horton wrote:
Thank you Milly. For purposes of OEM software licensing, "device"
refers to "motherboard".
Really? Have you got proof of this or are you interpreting again? My
OEM
EULA says *nothing* about a motherboard for both Office and XP.
It's on the top secret inner sanctum pages only revealed to genuine
Registered Members in the Microsoft Partner Program such as myself
(Organization Partner ID: 2337734 [Active] Horton Computer Service,
Silverton, CO). I even have a web site, see?
http://hortoncomputers.tripod.com/
The rationalization (and listen for once, you might learn something)
given is that the OEM who provided you with your computer cannot be
expected to continue to support either the computer or the OEM
software
pre-installed therein once you have upgraded a major component such
as a
motherboard. Once you do that you no longer qualify for the OEM's
excellent customer service, and your license to use the software,
which
you have actually received third party via the OEM, is no longer
valid.
Motherboard replacements are allowed for repair purposes,
but only with an identical replacement part. It would be extremely
unusual for the OP to have gotten an OEM Office Suite "uninstalled"
with a laptop purchase. The OEM software I have seen is already
"pre-installed" on the computer when you open the box. One of the
reasons that the retail product costs more, is that you are allowed
to
install it on multiple computers in succession.
Earle
Fact is, you are speculating but you're posting your speculation as
if
it were fact.
Why else would the retail product cost more, if it did not have more
value? By "more value" I mean the privilege of being able to call
Microsoft and pay for their excellent customer service, which you
cannot
do with your pathetic pirated OEM copy.
Cheers,
Earle
Um, I don't buy computers from OEMs. I build my own and, in essence, I
am
my own OEM and choose to support upgrading hardware, be it a hard
drive,
graphics card, processor or MOTHERBOARD. All my software is legally
and
properly licensed. I don't care what your speculative
"rationalization"
is; I care what is stated on what I agreed to. Your libelous and
totally
false accusation that I use pirated software was totally uncalled for.
In that case you are bound by the terms of the System Builder License.
http://www.microsoft.com/oem/sblicense/default.mspx
I believe that the relevant paragraph is this one.
5.b. «End User License Terms. You must distribute the Software pursuant
to
the end user license terms ("License Terms") that accompany it. Under
the
License Terms, you are the licensor.»
I find no way to interpret this that gives you the right to serially
install the software on multiple devices for your own use, pirate.
Cheers,
Earle
I never said it did. What did you get that from? I said I am bound by
the EULA that comes with the copy of Office that I bought and my EULA
says I may install it on one desktop and one laptop. It does not say
*anything* about a motherboard.
The OEM EULA does not say "one desktop and one laptop".
Earle