P
Patrick Schmid
Yes, I know.
But you aren't necessarily better off if you stored all your files in
the 97-2003 formats. For example, XLS files created in B1/B1TR might not
open in B2TR either.
Patrick Schmid
---------------
http://pschmid.net
But you aren't necessarily better off if you stored all your files in
the 97-2003 formats. For example, XLS files created in B1/B1TR might not
open in B2TR either.
Patrick Schmid
---------------
http://pschmid.net
That was actually already mentioned from the dogfood builds. The file format
was/is still under development throughout the BETA as well and except for
OneNote "upgrading" documents from earlier BETAs wouldn't be fully supported
(which includes "dirtying" it). It was recommended against storing important
data in the new file format.
--
Robert Sparnaaij [MVP-Outlook]
Coauthor, Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003
-----
Definitely different. Files created in B1 and B1TR don't open in B2TR
anymore, they actually produce a corrupt file error message. B2TR uses
the XML file formats according to the Ecma draft v1.4, B2 used 1.3. B1TR
and B1 were earlier versions.
Patrick Schmid
---------------
http://pschmid.net
Apparently not, however. Is the file format really different between
B1/B1TR
and B2 or only the version? In Word 97-2003, if you open a Word 6.0/95
doc,
you might be asked if you want to save in the current format, but if you
open, say, a Word 97 file in Word 2003, you don't get any sort of prompt,
since the file format is the same.
--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup
so
all may benefit.