Table layout displayed differently in Netscape & IE

[Stefan B Rusynko]

See
http://www.microsoft.com/office/frontpage/prodinfo/compare.mspx
And
http://www.microsoft.com/office/frontpage/prodinfo/servers.mspx




| Thanks guys - I'm thinking hard now!
|
| Previously Microsoft have published a comparison page for newer Office
| releases, but despite extensive searches on the Office website, I cannot
| find this for 2003. It would be nice to see a full table of changes to
| inform my choice.
|
|
| | > In addition to Jim Buyen's remarks, I would add the improved FTP and HTTP
| > publishing interface, and the advertised tweaks like layers, behaviours
| and
| > Dynamic Web Templates.
| >
| > --
| > Ron
| >
| > Reply only to group - all emails will be deleted unread.
| >
| >
| > | > >
| > > | > > > Sorry, I quit telephone support 4 years ago, and I trashed FP2002 10
| > > minutes
| > > > after installing the FP2003 Beta last March. FP2003 is much more
| > > civilised
| > > > about the (very, very little) code it inserts.
| > >
| > > Oh really? So, were I to upgrade to FP2K3, I would see less bloated
| code,
| > > less repeated unneccessary tags, improved cross-browser support from
| > > auto-generated code?
| > >
| > > What else, in your opinion, are the key benefits (not the advertised
| > tweaks,
| > > but the differences you'd report as worthwhile)?
| > >
| > >
| >
| >
|
|

 

[just me]

Thanks - don't know how I missed that before!

 

[just me]

Sorry Ron, Don't wish to drag this out forever, but now I know the reason
why my tables always looked so lousy in NS. It's that
style="BORDER-COLLAPSE: collapse" bordercolor="#111111" which is reinserted
over and over! Having made the changes you suggest and having set the
default is instructed I find that FP2K2 reinserts the damn code still! So I
have to delete these every time I make a change to the tables.

I guess I'll have to look seriously at 2003...