M
Mike Koewler
David,
I was getting ready to reply last night when my unfriendly headaches
paid a visit. Five hours of agony (along with about 20 pills later) I
went to bed. So here is what I read.
Hyper Text Transfer Protocol, or HTTP, is a protocol used to transfer
files <I>from a Web server onto a browser</I> in order to view a Web
page that is on the Internet. Unlike FTP, where entire files are
transferred from one device to another and copied into memory, HTTP only
transfers the contents of a web page into a browser for viewing. I read
David's articles and there does not appear to be any reason why
uploading a "Published" site via ftp is any different from uploading it
any other way. Even going through Publisher and publishing directly to
the web still employs, AFAICS, a File Transfer, moving files from a hard
drive to a web server. The difference, again AFAICS, is that until one
tells Pub top actually, er, Publish the site, it does not create the
htm(l) files nor the links. However, if one can Publish to disk, those
files are created. Then, it is a simple matter of transferring them to
the server. Perhaps the reason for recommending doing it all within Pub
is so users will not become confused with how to upload files in
sub-folders.
For instance, WebPlus uses a main folder for all the html pages as well
as some other files that are named by the designer. Images WP creates
some images and scripts. These images are stored in a _wp_images folder
and the scripts in a _wp_scripts folder. All the files "and the folders
they are in" have to be uploaded or transfered.
In reading what FPSE do, it seems they write the virtual links to
different folders as well as set permissions. Perhaps this is why the
pages must be uploaded via the program if one is using forms - certain
files must have read/write permissions in order to process form data and
relay it to the recipient. I don't know if this happens when publishing
to a disk drive or not. Yet, none of this would preclude one from from
uploading an image and setting a hyperlink to it. Much as we have
discussed, this would be an absolute link
(http://yourdomain.com/yourimage.jpg) rather than a relative one ('your
image.jpg' or even '/index_files/yourimage.jpg')
Of course, none of this addresses why Joyce cannot see her index_files
folder but then again, it's not really necessary she be able to, from
what I understand. That would only become a necessity if she was going
to use FTP to transfer the images.
Mike
I was getting ready to reply last night when my unfriendly headaches
paid a visit. Five hours of agony (along with about 20 pills later) I
went to bed. So here is what I read.
Hyper Text Transfer Protocol, or HTTP, is a protocol used to transfer
files <I>from a Web server onto a browser</I> in order to view a Web
page that is on the Internet. Unlike FTP, where entire files are
transferred from one device to another and copied into memory, HTTP only
transfers the contents of a web page into a browser for viewing. I read
David's articles and there does not appear to be any reason why
uploading a "Published" site via ftp is any different from uploading it
any other way. Even going through Publisher and publishing directly to
the web still employs, AFAICS, a File Transfer, moving files from a hard
drive to a web server. The difference, again AFAICS, is that until one
tells Pub top actually, er, Publish the site, it does not create the
htm(l) files nor the links. However, if one can Publish to disk, those
files are created. Then, it is a simple matter of transferring them to
the server. Perhaps the reason for recommending doing it all within Pub
is so users will not become confused with how to upload files in
sub-folders.
For instance, WebPlus uses a main folder for all the html pages as well
as some other files that are named by the designer. Images WP creates
some images and scripts. These images are stored in a _wp_images folder
and the scripts in a _wp_scripts folder. All the files "and the folders
they are in" have to be uploaded or transfered.
In reading what FPSE do, it seems they write the virtual links to
different folders as well as set permissions. Perhaps this is why the
pages must be uploaded via the program if one is using forms - certain
files must have read/write permissions in order to process form data and
relay it to the recipient. I don't know if this happens when publishing
to a disk drive or not. Yet, none of this would preclude one from from
uploading an image and setting a hyperlink to it. Much as we have
discussed, this would be an absolute link
(http://yourdomain.com/yourimage.jpg) rather than a relative one ('your
image.jpg' or even '/index_files/yourimage.jpg')
Of course, none of this addresses why Joyce cannot see her index_files
folder but then again, it's not really necessary she be able to, from
what I understand. That would only become a necessity if she was going
to use FTP to transfer the images.
Mike