why cant i install office 97 on xp

G

garfield-n-odie

I'll take your word for it about the melting thing. IMHO, Word (all
versions) generates really ugly HTML code and shouldn't be used for that
purpose.
 
G

garfield-n-odie

I'll take your word for it about the melting thing. IMHO, Word (all
versions) generates really ugly HTML code and shouldn't be used for that
purpose.
 
G

garfield-n-odie

I'll take your word for it about the melting thing. IMHO, Word (all
versions) generates really ugly HTML code and shouldn't be used for that
purpose.
 
G

garfield-n-odie

I'll take your word for it about the melting thing. IMHO, Word (all
versions) generates really ugly HTML code and shouldn't be used for that
purpose.
 
G

garfield-n-odie

I'll take your word for it about the melting thing. IMHO, Word (all
versions) generates really ugly HTML code and shouldn't be used for that
purpose.
 
G

garfield-n-odie

I'll take your word for it about the melting thing. IMHO, Word (all
versions) generates really ugly HTML code and shouldn't be used for that
purpose.
 
D

David R. Norton MVP

garfield-n-odie said:
Either of the methods I suggested should preclude the appearance
of the HTMLMARQ.OCX error message in the first place, which by
your own admission the registry hack may or may not fix.

Neither will allow the information of the HTML tools and, more
importantly, neither will allow the installation of updates,
specifically SR2.
 
D

David R. Norton MVP

garfield-n-odie said:
Either of the methods I suggested should preclude the appearance
of the HTMLMARQ.OCX error message in the first place, which by
your own admission the registry hack may or may not fix.

Neither will allow the information of the HTML tools and, more
importantly, neither will allow the installation of updates,
specifically SR2.
 
D

David R. Norton MVP

garfield-n-odie said:
Either of the methods I suggested should preclude the appearance
of the HTMLMARQ.OCX error message in the first place, which by
your own admission the registry hack may or may not fix.

Neither will allow the information of the HTML tools and, more
importantly, neither will allow the installation of updates,
specifically SR2.
 
D

David R. Norton MVP

garfield-n-odie said:
Either of the methods I suggested should preclude the appearance
of the HTMLMARQ.OCX error message in the first place, which by
your own admission the registry hack may or may not fix.

Neither will allow the information of the HTML tools and, more
importantly, neither will allow the installation of updates,
specifically SR2.
 
D

David R. Norton MVP

garfield-n-odie said:
Either of the methods I suggested should preclude the appearance
of the HTMLMARQ.OCX error message in the first place, which by
your own admission the registry hack may or may not fix.

Neither will allow the information of the HTML tools and, more
importantly, neither will allow the installation of updates,
specifically SR2.
 
D

David R. Norton MVP

garfield-n-odie said:
Either of the methods I suggested should preclude the appearance
of the HTMLMARQ.OCX error message in the first place, which by
your own admission the registry hack may or may not fix.

Neither will allow the information of the HTML tools and, more
importantly, neither will allow the installation of updates,
specifically SR2.
 
D

David R. Norton MVP

garfield-n-odie said:
Either of the methods I suggested should preclude the appearance
of the HTMLMARQ.OCX error message in the first place, which by
your own admission the registry hack may or may not fix.

Neither will allow the information of the HTML tools and, more
importantly, neither will allow the installation of updates,
specifically SR2.
 
D

David R. Norton MVP

garfield-n-odie said:
Either of the methods I suggested should preclude the appearance
of the HTMLMARQ.OCX error message in the first place, which by
your own admission the registry hack may or may not fix.

Neither will allow the information of the HTML tools and, more
importantly, neither will allow the installation of updates,
specifically SR2.
 
D

David R. Norton MVP

garfield-n-odie said:
Either of the methods I suggested should preclude the appearance
of the HTMLMARQ.OCX error message in the first place, which by
your own admission the registry hack may or may not fix.

Neither will allow the information of the HTML tools and, more
importantly, neither will allow the installation of updates,
specifically SR2.
 
D

David R. Norton MVP

garfield-n-odie said:
I'll take your word for it about the melting thing. IMHO, Word
(all versions) generates really ugly HTML code and shouldn't be
used for that purpose.

Agreed. When I had Office 97 and wanted to create a webpage I
downloaded OO and used it to create the webpage. Now that I've
upgraded to Office 2003 I've not had occasion to try it's HTML
capabilities.
 
D

David R. Norton MVP

garfield-n-odie said:
I'll take your word for it about the melting thing. IMHO, Word
(all versions) generates really ugly HTML code and shouldn't be
used for that purpose.

Agreed. When I had Office 97 and wanted to create a webpage I
downloaded OO and used it to create the webpage. Now that I've
upgraded to Office 2003 I've not had occasion to try it's HTML
capabilities.
 
D

David R. Norton MVP

garfield-n-odie said:
I'll take your word for it about the melting thing. IMHO, Word
(all versions) generates really ugly HTML code and shouldn't be
used for that purpose.

Agreed. When I had Office 97 and wanted to create a webpage I
downloaded OO and used it to create the webpage. Now that I've
upgraded to Office 2003 I've not had occasion to try it's HTML
capabilities.
 
D

David R. Norton MVP

garfield-n-odie said:
I'll take your word for it about the melting thing. IMHO, Word
(all versions) generates really ugly HTML code and shouldn't be
used for that purpose.

Agreed. When I had Office 97 and wanted to create a webpage I
downloaded OO and used it to create the webpage. Now that I've
upgraded to Office 2003 I've not had occasion to try it's HTML
capabilities.
 
D

David R. Norton MVP

garfield-n-odie said:
I'll take your word for it about the melting thing. IMHO, Word
(all versions) generates really ugly HTML code and shouldn't be
used for that purpose.

Agreed. When I had Office 97 and wanted to create a webpage I
downloaded OO and used it to create the webpage. Now that I've
upgraded to Office 2003 I've not had occasion to try it's HTML
capabilities.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top