Word 2004 + Macintel + Some Adobe OpenType Fonts = Crash on save

G

gruth

If you don't care about using "fancy" fonts, then your solution is
fairly simple.

Open Font Book (in the Applications folder).

Disable all the non-system fonts on your computer. (Go to menu: Edit
--> Disable)

To tell which fonts are the standard OS X System fonts, check this
link:
http://www.xvsxp.com/system/fonts_view.php

In addition, you should leave these fonts, since some Office programs
use them:
Arial
Arial Black
Comic Sans MS
Tahoma
Trebuchet MS
Verdana
Webdings
 
J

John C. Welch

After losing an hour of work, I really want to avoid using offending
fonts until there's a permanent fix from MS and Apple.

I wish somebody could explain in simple language which fonts are okay
to use and which are not. I don't really understand the difference
between OTF and PS fonts, though I'm pretty sure I have both.

So far, the only fonts that seem to not be affected at all are TrueType. The
bugger - all part of this is that there's no consistency in this problem,
other than Intel Macs and Word, which makes it fiendishly difficult to track
down.
 
J

John C. Welch

So does anyone in Microsoft's Mac division have an estimate on when
this problem will be resolved? I understand that it involves both Apple
& MS, but given this, can you shed any light on the timeline?

There'd be no way, even assuming they knew, for anyone from Microsoft to be
able to say when any Apple bugs would be fixed.
 
G

Gavin Lawrie

Specific details that would help:

1) can someone PLEASE test this on 10.4.7? There appear to be some ATSUI
changes in that version.

I did this as soon as it came out and posted the results in the forum -
others did too. It doesn't solve the problem.
2) if some of you are comfortable with it, when you see ATSServer doing it's
bouncing, run fs_usage for a bit. That could be helpful in seeing just what
word and other things are doing to the file system.

Tried, but as when this happens the computer goes into a death-spiral
killing apps and then logging out the user, this was simply too hard to
get to work: the whole thing is over (on our machines anyhow) in about
30 secs, during which time machine is not very responsive. In fact
sometimes if you don't get to Word quickly enough, you can't get the
force-quit option showing at all and you just have to wait for machine
to die. Any suggestions about how to do this another way?
3) on the systems this is happening on, are there any haxies, addons,
anything in the menu bar that Apple didn't supply, etc. InputManagers and
APE count, even if you aren't actively using them.

If you recall when this problem first emerged, I spent an inordinate
amount of time trying to characterise the problem - including such
desparate acts as initialising the MacIntel (complete HD wipe and
reinstall), back-grading Office and OS X separately etc. None of these
made any difference - and by implications eliminate the risk arising
from widgets, addons and the like.
4) When this happens, has anyone immediately created a new clean test user
and tried to work with the same document in that?

Yes. See original messages in this thread. Didn't work.
5) WRT to the fonts, is this in conjunction with a font manager? what is the
specific font setup on the affected machines, i.e. directory locations.

See original messages (do you see a pattern emerging here...?). During
work to characterise the problem it was suggested that various font
managers and font cache cleaning utilities would help. None did.
Except that with a Font Manager it is easier to remove the offending
fonts from the font folder.
6) On the fonts causing the problem, does Font Book's font check come up
clean?

That was one of the first things we tried (along with font cleaners,
font inspectors, font repair tools etc.). As posted in the initial
messages, none of the fonts was faulty.
7) on the affected machines, has anyone touched any of the fonts in
/System/Library/Fonts for any reason?

No, but in the testing / reinstalling etc these fonts would have been
reset to their default / unchanged state, and this didn't solve the
problem. So suspect that this is nothing to do with it.
8) On the affected machines, have you checked the permissions for the fonts.
(No, "Repair Permissions" doesn't count, as it, at most, would only touch
the main font directory.)

Didn't try this first time around (this is the first time it has been
suggested). Using the method described elsewhere in the thread we get:

-rwzrwxrwx 1 gavinlaw gavinlaw 174112 Sep 15 2005
/Users/gavinlawrie/Library/Fonts/2GC Fonts/MinonPro-Regular.otf

Just in case you are wondering, we also tried moving the fonts from a
sub-directory to the main directory, but makes no difference. Putting
the fonts in a folder makes it easier to remove them...

So. Hope this helps. I am really disappointed that so far nothing has
been done to address this issue on grounds that it can't be reproduced:
we here have gone to extraordinary lengths to characterise this
problem, demonstrate it is repeatable, isolate features that seem to
trigger it, and provide exhaustive information on the machines we are
running into the problem on. With the exception of your Question 8,
all the 'missing' information requested has been provided before.
Looks like we wasting our time.

We have long since demonstrated that we can create a machine with the
problem by reinstalling OS X from the distribution disk, and installing
Office 2004 from the MS CD, installing our standard fonts, opening a
document that uses these fonts and saving it. Doing same again with
our standard fonts removed, and you don't have the problem. Quite why
this fails on other machines is a mystery - but suggests to me that if
we sent over one of our documents and our standard fonts, the rest
(i.e. a MacIntel reset to its distribution condition, with vanilla
Office 2004 installed) could be supplied by someone at either MS or
Apple.

Let me know if you want to do this...

Regards

Gavin Lawrie
 
G

Gavin Lawrie

But No. They can't do anything about it until we start getting detailed
information.

So both Microsoft and Apple are simply going to sit there doing nothing
until we get the detail they need.

If you want the bug fixed: please send DETAILS.

As per note in another post on this topic. This type of attitude
annoys me alot: I started this thread, sometime early May (at least
earlier than 7th May). This is a serious problem for us, and we have
provided notes on detailed and exhaustive efforts to try and pin down
this problem - including completely re-initialising a couple of our
computers, backgrading OS and Office versions, changing fonts, using
font managers etc. etc. etc. Days of effort. Was it badly written?
Was something vital missed out? If so, why haven't you commented on
this at the time...?

What is it that wasn't provided that you need to know?

Gavin Lawrie
 
J

John McGhie [MVP - Word and Word Macintosh]

Hi Gavin:

Sorry if my remarks upset you. They were not aimed at YOU. Your
meticulously detailed research was just what was needed.

My remarks were a follow to a post by a different user, who was basically
providing no further information than the assertion "It's broken". Which we
already knew. What I needed (three weeks ago...) was a similar amount of
detail from another user. This was when they were having difficulty
isolating the problem.

As a result of your postings, the issue HAS now been replicated by the
software testers on the responsible development teams. I believe they now
know what it is, and where it is. But I have no more detail than that.

So I think it is no longer the case that "nothing is being done". I believe
action is now under way. I would love to be able to tell you more, but I
don't have any more information to tell you.

On a personal note, speaking only for myself, I remain convinced that this
issue is an Apple OS bug that should be addressed by Apple. Regrettably,
neither Apple nor Microsoft employees would be permitted to come in here to
confirm (or deny) this. The legal situation in the USA would mean that any
admission or assertion on the part of either company could lead to expensive
consequences.

So now, we wait. I remain convinced that this issue will be fixed by an
Apple patch. I don't know if that's correct, and I have no idea when.

Cheers

As per note in another post on this topic. This type of attitude
annoys me alot: I started this thread, sometime early May (at least
earlier than 7th May). This is a serious problem for us, and we have
provided notes on detailed and exhaustive efforts to try and pin down
this problem - including completely re-initialising a couple of our
computers, backgrading OS and Office versions, changing fonts, using
font managers etc. etc. etc. Days of effort. Was it badly written?
Was something vital missed out? If so, why haven't you commented on
this at the time...?

What is it that wasn't provided that you need to know?

Gavin Lawrie

--

Please reply to the newsgroup to maintain the thread. Please do not email
me unless I ask you to.

John McGhie <[email protected]>
Microsoft MVP, Word and Word for Macintosh. Consultant Technical Writer
Sydney, Australia +61 (0) 4 1209 1410
 
G

Gavin Lawrie

As a result of your postings, the issue HAS now been replicated by the
software testers on the responsible development teams.

That is very encouraging news. Thanks for sharing it.
The legal situation in the USA would mean that any
admission or assertion on the part of either company could lead to expensive
consequences.

I'm sure, and understand the reluctance to self-incriminate. We're not
so interested in lawsuits, we just want to get on with using the
programme...
So now, we wait. I remain convinced that this issue will be fixed by an
Apple patch. I don't know if that's correct, and I have no idea when.

I'll keep all fingers and toes crossed etc.

Regards

Gavin Lawrie.
 
H

Hugh Watkins

Gavin said:
As per note in another post on this topic. This type of attitude annoys
me alot: I started this thread, sometime early May (at least earlier
than 7th May). This is a serious problem for us, and we have provided
notes on detailed and exhaustive efforts to try and pin down this
problem - including completely re-initialising a couple of our
computers, backgrading OS and Office versions, changing fonts, using
font managers etc. etc. etc. Days of effort. Was it badly written?
Was something vital missed out? If so, why haven't you commented on
this at the time...?

What is it that wasn't provided that you need to know?


I am new on the group
so I am blowed if i will read lots of old files

so pleas briefly define the problem

the trick with ny macintosh is to freeze old machines OS and software
once they work well

and don't update OS or APPS unmless security issues arise like WinXP


this machine is on Tiger and I am not certain I will update ever

I won't get Windows Vista for at least a year after the launch
I run WinXP via parallels desktop on this Imtel mac too


what kind of work are you doing on the Macs?


regards



Hugh W
 
P

Paul Berkowitz

We have long since demonstrated that we can create a machine with the
problem by reinstalling OS X from the distribution disk, and installing
Office 2004 from the MS CD, installing our standard fonts, opening a
document that uses these fonts and saving it. Doing same again with
our standard fonts removed, and you don't have the problem. Quite why
this fails on other machines is a mystery - but suggests to me that if
we sent over one of our documents and our standard fonts, the rest
(i.e. a MacIntel reset to its distribution condition, with vanilla
Office 2004 installed) could be supplied by someone at either MS or
Apple.

Let me know if you want to do this...

John does not work for either Microsoft nr Apple. (Neither do I.) He's just
an Entourage user like you, who's trying, or hoping, to help. We may be able
to pass on your details to someone at Microsoft, if they haven't seen them
yet. But they probably have. Do not expect someone from Microsoft to reply
here, but they will be looking into the problem. At such time as they are
able to figure it out and get it fixed (whether in-house or by Apple, as the
case may be), an update to office or the OS will be posted. Frustrating as
this may be for you, things don't always get solved right away.



--
Paul Berkowitz
MVP MacOffice
Entourage FAQ Page: <http://www.entourage.mvps.org/faq/index.html>
AppleScripts for Entourage: <http://macscripter.net/scriptbuilders/>

Please "Reply To Newsgroup" to reply to this message. Emails will be
ignored.

PLEASE always state which version of Microsoft Office you are using -
**2004**, X or 2001. It's often impossible to answer your questions
otherwise.
 
P

Paul Berkowitz

As per note in another post on this topic. This type of attitude
annoys me alot: I started this thread, sometime early May (at least
earlier than 7th May). This is a serious problem for us, and we have
provided notes on detailed and exhaustive efforts to try and pin down
this problem - including completely re-initialising a couple of our
computers, backgrading OS and Office versions, changing fonts, using
font managers etc. etc. etc. Days of effort. Was it badly written?
Was something vital missed out? If so, why haven't you commented on
this at the time...?

What is it that wasn't provided that you need to know?

This just seems to be a misunderstanding. John was not following this
newsgroup back in May when you provided the details. You may not be aware,
but with newsgroups, when the server is refreshed as it must be from time to
time to make room for new postings, the older messages are wiped. (Even for
people who _did_ get the earlier messages, the synchronization of your
newsgroup cache with the server means that the earlier will get removed from
the cache at the same. For example, I see no earlier message in this thread
than yours of June 20, 2006, although it is clearly a reply beginning with
Re: . It may be that I too wasn't reading regularly back in May, but I think
it's more likely that the messages were removed from the server since then.)
So even if John went back and reviewed all messages in the tread, he
wouldn't find the original one.

It's clearly very frustrating for you. Perhaps John also doesn't know about
the removal of earlier messages from the server, so he naturally thought you
hadn't provided the details he's asking for. Since John is rather more
expert in this area than most people, he was begged to take a look in this
newsgroup, which he has been decent enough to do. Please don't berate him
for it. It's good you repeated the details, and unfortunate that you had to
repeat yourself. But, just in case those details did not make it to the
right people in Microsoft last time, you can rest assured that they will be
this time. That still does not give any guarantee as to when the issue will
be figured out and fixed. But it will eventually happen.

I think the best thing would be if you just started over from the beginning
and provided the same details you did the first time. No, I can't fix
anything, and am not even knowledgeable in this area. And I don't even have
a MacIntel yet. But the details will be passed on. If John or someone else
wants to elicit further details, I'm sure they'll ask.

--
Paul Berkowitz
MVP MacOffice
Entourage FAQ Page: <http://www.entourage.mvps.org/faq/index.html>
AppleScripts for Entourage: <http://macscripter.net/scriptbuilders/>

Please "Reply To Newsgroup" to reply to this message. Emails will be
ignored.

PLEASE always state which version of Microsoft Office you are using -
**2004**, X or 2001. It's often impossible to answer your questions
otherwise.
 
B

Beth Rosengard

Hi Gavin,

It's not necessary for you to repeat any details. I think Paul has gotten
confused. All of your relevant posts in this and the other two threads on
this subject have been passed on to MSFT by one or another of the MVPs and
if they hadn't been, they'd be available via Google Groups whether they were
still on the Microsoft server or not.

The information you have provided has been invaluable and I hope it leads to
a fix soon (though I have no inside knowledge to that effect)!

Regards,

Beth

--
***Please always reply to the newsgroup!***

Beth Rosengard
MacOffice MVP

Mac Word FAQ: <http://word.mvps.org/Mac/WordMacHome.html>
My Site: <http://www.bethrosengard.com>
 
G

Gavin Lawrie

John does not work for either Microsoft nr Apple. (Neither do I.) He's just
an Entourage user like you, who's trying, or hoping, to help. We may be able
to pass on your details to someone at Microsoft, if they haven't seen them
yet. But they probably have.

Yes, I know. I was indeed directing the comment at any Apple or MS
lurkers watching...

G.
 
J

John McGhie [MVP -- Word and Word Mac]

And they heard you :)

Unfortunately, there's nothing they are allowed to say. The fix will turn
up in System Update, eventually...

Cheers
 
G

gruth

This is a longshot, but is anyone reading this a developer with access
to 10.5. I am quite curious if this problem crops up on 10.5.

Relatedly, any news on when 10.4.8 might be released -- and more
importantly, any inside scoop on whether that release will address the
problem? Apple's boards are dead on this right now, at least to the
best of my searching ability.

Also: my current workaround has been to set font subtitution as a
program-wide default in Word. However, I have a LOT of files with
MathType files embedded, and Word also crashes on save when any of
these files contain AGaramond. Modifying these files to not contain
AGaramond will be a giant pain in the ass because I'll have to change
the fonts in each equation separately -- at least, I think this is
true. Can anyone give any insight into a better way of doing this.

Thanks much,
Geoff
 
P

Paul Berkowitz

I don't have access to the 10.5 preview, but I might know someone who
has. I'll make sure I can reproduce the problem on mine when it arrives
and then I'll construct a test document. Besides I probably gotta wait
till he gets over the jet lag, gets his Macca back together after UK
security STASI crushed it in hold baggage and then sent it to Frankfurt
and back by truck.

Sounds like fun. ;-) What's a Macca?

--
Paul Berkowitz
MVP MacOffice
Entourage FAQ Page: <http://www.entourage.mvps.org/faq/index.html>
AppleScripts for Entourage: <http://macscripter.net/scriptbuilders/>

Please "Reply To Newsgroup" to reply to this message. Emails will be
ignored.

PLEASE always state which version of Microsoft Office you are using -
**2004**, X or 2001. It's often impossible to answer your questions
otherwise.
 
E

Elliott Roper

Paul Berkowitz said:
Sounds like fun. ;-) What's a Macca?

Sorry, I slipped into Strine for a moment. Macintosh. Also known as a
PBoko after a famous typo on uk.com.sys.mac, where today, Apple's next
operating system has become "Leotard"
 
J

John McGhie [MVP -- Word and Word Mac]

Elliott:

You've been away too long...

*Correctly* a "Macca" is some revolting grease and salt-laden object made by
Ronnie at Les Golden Arches, otherwise known as "Macca's".

In other words: the Strine term is reserved for a MacDonald's hamburger,
usually, the Big Mac.

Cheers
 
P

Phillip Jones

There way two women vacationing in Kissimee Fl.

They were having a disagreement over the pronunciation.

One says Its pronounced Kiss-i-me.
The other no it key-seem-e!

Finally they decided to go into a restaurant to find out.

They go up to the order counter and ask a person working the counter.

How do you pronounce this place?

Counter person answers: "Can ... you ... say ... Mac ... Donald's?? ;-)
Elliott:

You've been away too long...

*Correctly* a "Macca" is some revolting grease and salt-laden object made by
Ronnie at Les Golden Arches, otherwise known as "Macca's".

In other words: the Strine term is reserved for a MacDonald's hamburger,
usually, the Big Mac.

Cheers

--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phillip M. Jones, CET |LIFE MEMBER: VPEA ETA-I, NESDA, ISCET, Sterling
616 Liberty Street |Who's Who. PHONE:276-632-5045, FAX:276-632-0868
Martinsville Va 24112 |[email protected], ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet
------------------------------------------------------------------------

If it's "fixed", don't "break it"!

mailto:p[email protected]

<http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/default.htm>
<http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/90th_Birthday/index.htm>
<http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/Fulcher/default.html>
<http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/Harris/default.htm>
<http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/Jones/default.htm>

<http://www.vpea.org>
 
A

Aaron G.

Hi folks,

While I don't have a cure, I DO have a work-around: disable saving the
preview picture for the documents already in use, and turn this option off
for all future work.

One of Hans de Jong's posts talked about the number of characters in the
document being a factor (and it is) and when I checked the properties of our
problem documents, I noticed the "Save preview picture with this document"
option was checked under "Summary." I unchecked it, and saved a document I
had been unable to on my shiny new MacBook Pro since I got it.

ATSServer is the Apple process involved, but I don't think it's at fault, or
Excel and Power Point would be similarly affected, and they’re not.

When I look at the ATSServer crash log, it looks a lot like an Acrobat crash
log, ending in references to "Binary Images Description" It looks like
ATSServer is trying to render the text for the Word preview. Turn off the
preview and life is good.

Aaron Grice
2.0Ghz MacBook Pro
10.4.7 with Extensis Suitcase 11.0.4
Office 2004, 11.2.6
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top